srsly? you would srsly flip a senate seat because he’s not “pure” enough for you?
a vote for grimes is a vote for harry reid as senate majority leader. if that is what you are saying, you should be required to explain why.
McConnell is not only not pure he has no principles and is an incompetent senate leader. Sometimes one must sacrifice these types of Republicans for the greater good.
What will Mitch do as Senate Leader to benefit the country from 2015 to 2017 (when the 'rats are likely to regain the Senate)?
That is their explanation, it’s much of the reason we have Obama instead of Romney. If a republican who is mostly fiscally conservative, has common sense ideas and solutions, but doesn’t want to tackle social issues that they are against, then they won’t vote for them. It’s a common trend, and it’s disgusting. You’re not going to find a perfect politician, especially in America. Therefore, we get politicians that wouldn’t even be hired as a manager at a McDonald’s, or able to open and run a small business successfully trying to manage a country. Besides that, these people are reacting very poorly to international and domestic issues. These politicians that we are cursed with live in a fantasy world. Voting for someone that cannot win is essentially a vote for these people that I would not trust to walk a dog, or serve me food.
But too bad, not good enough for me, well I WANT OBAMA! It’s sickening.
“pure enough”??
He is a self-avowed enemy of the conservative movement in this country, and you think people oppose him because he isn’t “pure enough”?
Why would any conservative be anxious to see that scumbag traitor back in the Senate?