Posted on 07/28/2014 11:35:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
Michelle Obama wants the federal government to tell us what kind of food to eat.
I actually wouldnt object if she merely used a bully pulpit to encourage healthier eating. But the busy-body crowd in Washington has a hard time distinguishing between giving advice and engaging in coercion.
So we now have legislation that gives Washington the power to interfere with food in local schools.
But not everybody is rolling over, particularly when federal rules are coercing states into banning bake sales. The National Journal reports on growing resistance to this absurd example of nanny statism from Washington. Here are some excerpts.
states are fighting nutrition standards that would considerably alter one of the most sacred rituals of the American public school system: bake sales. Twelve states have established their own policies to circumvent regulations in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 that apply to competitive snacks, or any foods and beverages sold to students on school grounds that are not part of the Agriculture Departments school meal programs, according to the National Association of State Boards of Education. Competitive snacks appear in vending machines, school stores, and food and beverages, including items sold at bake sales. The pushback is not about students taste buds, but their wallets. Food fundraisers are a crucial source of revenue for schools, state education officials say. Tough economic times have translated into fewer resources and these fundraisers allow our schools to raise a considerable amount of money for very worthwhile education programs, the Georgia Department of Education wrote in a recent press release. The statement called the federal guidelines on fundraisers an absolute overreach of the federal government.
Kudos to the Georgia officials who complained about government overreach.
But dont forget that local governments certainly are capable of overreach as well, as this cartoon illustrates.
If you think banning bake sales is an example of government run amok, then youll be equally perturbed by whats happening in California.
According to the Associated Press, some residents are being put in a no-win situation of being fined by either state or local government based on whether or not they water their lawns.
Im not joking. Check out these blurbs from the story.
Laura Whitney and her husband, Michael Korte, dont know whether theyre being good citizens during a drought or scofflaws. On the same day the state approved mandatory outdoor watering restrictions with the threat of $500 fines, the Southern California couple received a letter from their city threatening a $500 penalty for not watering their brown lawn. Theyre among residents caught in the middle of conflicting government messages as the need for conservation clashes with the need to preserve attractive neighborhoods. My friends in Los Angeles got these letters warning they could be fined if they water, and I got a letter warning that I could be fined for not watering, Whitney said. I felt like I was in an alternate universe.
Its not an alternative universe. As Andy Johnson, Anthony Smelley, Charlie Engle, Tammy Cooper, Nancy Black, Russ Caswell, Jacques Wajsfelner, Jeff Councelller, Martha Boneta, Salvatore Culosi, and James Lieto can atttest, governments routinely abuse innocent people.
But at least we can take comfort in the fact that governments outside of America engage in equally silly actions.
Though I confess Im not sure how to categorize the news thats being reported by the BBC. As you can see from these excerpts, theres apparently now a rule in China limiting public officials to no more than three mistresses.
Weve heard a lot about Chinas far-reaching anti-corruption campaign at the behest of President Xi Jinping. But according to a report in the English-language newspaper China Daily, adultery is now banned for party members. But just when you thought the party was taking a puritanical stand, the newspaper said that when authorities had previously accused officials of moral corruption they defined this as having more than three mistresses.
The Princess of the Levant didnt allow me to engage in any field research on this issue during my recent trip to Shanghai, so I cant comment on the accuracy of the story.
Though I wonder whether Chinese officials got any advice from Americas 42nd president before imposing these rules?
Is this a life limit or is this more than three at one time?
Or maybe per encounter?
Insert "cupcake" joke here.
I don’t think I’ve ever heard that one
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.