If it weren't for sympathetic judges legislating from the bench, the homosexual agenda wouldn't be half as far along as it is.
We knuckle-draggers just have to remember: it's not wrong when they do it.
These judges are sickening, endorsing and forcing the citizenry to support perversion.
May God, the Righteous Judge, have His way.
The Fox tv station just reported two lesbians were going to have a “more perfect union” in the near future....the media trying to be a voice of moral authority.
Foul.
From the article:
“Zabel wrote in her order, citing a 1967 Supreme Court ruling that overturned a state ban on interracial marriage.”
Interracial marriage and homosexuality are NOT THE SAME THING.
Are there no black robed people with INTELLIGENCE any more??
Why do these idiot judges stop there? Why are they not including polygamy and the pedophile community? If a homosexual pervert has the right why not the other perversions? You know it is coming down the road....
The state may recognize abomination, but I don’t, nor do I have to according to the Constitution.
no one in their right mind can call gay unions marriage. It is a sexual preference and nothing more. Nothing will change that.
The lawsuits are brought up before known, sympathetic judges. It’s not coincidence. The fix is alive and well, but America is sick.
If it weren't for sympathetic judges legislating from the bench, the homosexual agenda wouldn't be half as far along as it is.
We knuckle-draggers just have to remember: it's not wrong when they do it.
How can there be a ban on something that cannot exist?
Maybe lawmakers and the public should phrase this differently, in a way to force these judges to define exactly what they mean when they say “gay marriage.” How can a license be issued to engage in something that does not exist, when no one even knows what it is?
~Newt Gingrich, 2012
According to Joan Rivers we have same "Sex" sex going on in the black house!!!