The NYT is Obama’s and the Marxist’s go to guy for everything.They hope they will be eaten last. They are wrong of course.
Hillary’s $14 million turd is on Amazon’s Best Sellers Rank: #141 in Books.
Bunkerville is still relevant and timely —he needs to get out a movie soon about it.
Make hay while the sun shines.
F&F and Benghazi also might make for low-hanging fruit.
“Liberal arithmetic” or “liberal scorekeeping” are subject to a number of “finagle factors” that always gives them the answer they want, or at least the one they have projected.
Now, some very small store somewhere, that sells a couple of copies of a specific title, is weighted much more heavily than, say, a Wal-Mart sale of hundreds of copies, because the people who buy from the small retailer are more “significant” readers, and thus the QUALITY of the sale, not the quantity, is the determining factor.
Wonder if I can download it on my reader——I’ll have to check…..
Not really surprised any more
And we are surprised at media bias for what reason exactly?
The NYT is in the 1,001st spot on my list of rags, just behind The Communist Liar’s Chronicle.
You should have named the book in your vanity; I assume you Mean “America: Imagine a world without her”, yes?
Authors have been trying to second guess the New York Times list for years. You have to remember that the list is sampling (like a poll) it is not based on absolute or comprehensive numbers. For starters, the NYT lists are based on sales from TWO WEEKS previous to the list date. The fact is, even today with computers it is still very difficult to determine absolute sales of a book over a time period as short as a week with inventories spread far and wide and in various stages of shipment and fulfillment. Most best-seller lists try to balance the RATE of sales and how widespread sales are in disparate locations. I don’t necessarily agree with how they do it, or even claim to know in depth how they come up with their rankings, but suffice it to say it’s really hard to second-guess those numbers. I offer this after a decade of following book sales lists and sales tracking methods. My wife is a best-selling author so it’s important to me. D’Souza is doing really well and his rankings are bound to change in the coming weeks, but I don’t necessarily see an ideological bias in these numbers.
They are putting Common Core math into use.
The NY Times had no time to calculate the totals because they were too busy writing an article about how “There is no bias in the media”