Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Forbids Use of ‘Redskins’ in Court Documents
Washington Post ^ | July 14 | Theresa Vargas

Posted on 07/15/2014 4:57:42 PM PDT by nickcarraway

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office isn’t the only federal authority that has taken a stance against the name of the Washington Redskins.

A federal judge in Maryland issued a ruling last week that purposely did not contain the team’s name, which has been described as an offensive slur against Native Americans.

U.S. District Judge Peter J. Messitte, who is presiding over a lawsuit that former New York Giants linebacker Barrett Green brought against the Redskins, issued a 21-page ruling with this footnote on the first page:

“Pro Football’s team is popularly known as the Washington ‘Redskins,’ but the Court will refrain from using the team name unless reference is made to a direct quote where the name appears.” Instead, he wrote, the team will be referred to as “the Washington Team.”

The note comes months after Messitte ordered attorneys in the case not to use the team’s name in his courtroom, according to one of the lawyers.

Messitte, who was born in the District and attended Bethesda-Chevy Chase High School, said he had no comment when reached by phone Monday. “My footnote is what it is,” he said.

Team officials also had no comment.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: court; football; idiocy; idiot; idiots; judge; lunacy; redskins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2014 4:57:42 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

More proof that a judge is just a lawyer with too much power.


2 posted on 07/15/2014 4:59:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The judge almost makes it to the “the truth is what I say it is” level.


3 posted on 07/15/2014 5:01:16 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

And what’s the penalty for using it in a legal document. This is BOGUS!


4 posted on 07/15/2014 5:04:17 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This really p***** me off. A little bias there judge?

Tell the judge that all these names came around to memorialize the Redskins so they wouldn't be forgotten. I believe one of the Roosevelt boys began this remembrance. It certainly wasn't dissing them. "I'm trying to recall the quote....IMOW..."If it wasn't for the white man, they would have killed themselves off."

5 posted on 07/15/2014 5:04:42 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I find the name of that judge offensive. Henceforth, he shall be referred to as “That Idiot Federal Judge in Maryland”.


6 posted on 07/15/2014 5:07:16 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The tyrants in black robes sure do have a problem with the pesky Bill of Rights. How can we be good, obedient commies and Nazis with crap like the First and Second Amendments out there?! Hrumpf! Hrumpf! Right Judgey?


7 posted on 07/15/2014 5:07:58 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Prohibited words are multiplying fast.

Husband and wife are verboten in California.


8 posted on 07/15/2014 5:08:05 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No lawyer here, but can’t this judge be removed from the case for a preexisting bias of some kind? This case does not involve a trademark issue, which perhaps could justify withholding the name…


9 posted on 07/15/2014 5:10:04 PM PDT by mikrofon (Founders BUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

so be it! I will suggest that the Washington Redskins change their name to “The Washington Redskin Potatoes”. and then lets see if anyone complains.


10 posted on 07/15/2014 5:10:34 PM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Gee, I wonder what would happen if he presided over a case involving the United Negro College Fund.


11 posted on 07/15/2014 5:10:56 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Who instructed this Fecal “judge” to do this anyway? Who complained? I wonder if he even knows even one REAL Indian. Just one. And I’m not talking about “Indians” from the Fauxcahontas Warren tribe who spent the 60s running around in beaded Indian headbands.


12 posted on 07/15/2014 5:13:10 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The judge was making an application to be the next supreme court nominee?!!?


13 posted on 07/15/2014 5:15:29 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Peter Principle at work.


14 posted on 07/15/2014 5:16:55 PM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds like an appeal for judicial prejudice would be a slam dunk.


15 posted on 07/15/2014 5:18:28 PM PDT by llevrok (Straight. Since 1950.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

and how about all of those Asian restaurants that use the words “Fuk” and Fooking” in their names.or just Japanese names with the letters F,U,and K in them? should they be changed legally?


16 posted on 07/15/2014 5:25:34 PM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cruz_West_Paul2016

How about “The Washington Foreskins”? It would get the Jewish vote.

As we Jews say, “gives new meaning to the word Snippet”.


17 posted on 07/15/2014 5:32:27 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds like this judge is prejudiced against the Washington (redacted).


18 posted on 07/15/2014 5:35:22 PM PDT by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (I'm not anti-government, government's anti-me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

That would be fitting for the locale also. Would honor all the pri@#$ in DC.


19 posted on 07/15/2014 5:35:54 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

is redneck an offensive racial slur?


20 posted on 07/15/2014 5:37:26 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson