Posted on 07/12/2014 8:41:19 AM PDT by NYer
The most recent case in Polands abortion wars will test the countrys conscience.
The case centers around Professor Bogdan Chazan, one of Polands top doctors and director of the Holy Family Hospital in Warsaw (Szpital im. Świętej Rodziny). Chazan came under firelast month when he refused to perform an abortion on a deformed baby who had been conceived in vitro in a fertility clinic. Instead of an abortion, Chazan offered medical advice for the mother, hospital care before, during and after the pregnancy, and perinatal hospice care for the child.
Although Polish law permits abortion of sick babies until viability, it does not create the right to an abortion. It merely decriminalizes abortion for the doctor and the mother. This particular pregnancy did not pose a danger to the womans health. Also, according to Polish law, any physician can invoke the countrys conscience clause, which ensures that no doctor or medical professional will ever be required to perform, or participate in, an abortion. Nonetheless, Chazans hospital was fined 70,000 zloty (approximately $23,000) for his refusal.
Government officials justified the fine by claiming that Chazan had not used the conscience clause properly. Namely, they claimed that he was required to give the patient the name of an abortionist.
However, as the legal organization Ordo Iuris Institute pointed out, forcing Chazan to do this violates his constitutional right to the freedom of conscience. That is why the law used to fine Chazan was being challenged in the Constitutional Tribunal by the National Board of Medical Doctors. This challenge was initiated even before Chazans case. According to Ordo Iuris Institute, requiring a doctor to refer women to abortionists is unconstitutional because it destroys the purpose of the conscience clause by forcing unwilling doctors to indirectly participate in abortions.
Refusal to participate in certain procedures on the basis of religious beliefs or moral convictions is a constitutionally protected right in Poland, and was recognized by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in 2010. In Poland, as in the United States, the Constitution trumps legal statutes. Therefore, Chazans actions were well within his constitutional rights. Lawyer and professor Ireneusz Wołoszczuk confirmed that Chazan hadnt broken any law, and called the attacks and fine scandalous.
Indeed, Chazan seems to be the victim of a sting by those who would love to challenge Polands strict abortion laws in the European Human Rights Court. Chazan is a well-known pro-life icon, and no Polish woman would have gone to him for an abortion unless she had been specifically directed by someone trying to discredit the doctor. Additionally, although there is no official list of abortionists, it is hardly top-secret information for those who seek it.
Furthermore, because of Chazans actions, his hospital has been a subject to several government inspections. In fact, the governments four inspections have violated the law, which allows only one at a time. The inspections are odd given the hospitals outstanding reputation. Pregnant women throughout Warsaw want to give birth there, and the number of deliveries has tripled since Chazan took over. Further, its statistics for infant and maternal health are the envy of Polish doctors. The hospitals perinatal mortality rate, for example, is twice as low as the national average.
Chazans unwavering moral convictions have caused a fury in the pro-abortion media. Numerous politicians, mostly post-communist and staunchly anti-clerical, have joined the attack. One of them is Member of Parliament Wanda Nowicka, former head of a pro-abortion group. Her organization has received funds from Ipas, which distributes abortion equipment all over the world, and the pharmaceutical company Gedeon Richter, a birth control producer. Twelve years ago Nowicka was involved in a similar attack on Chazan that cost the doctor his position as a government consultant and director of a gynecological department at the Institute of Mother and Child (Instytut Matki i Dziecka) in Warsaw.
Chazans feminist critics, such as Nowicka, should value Chazans work, both inside Poland and abroad. He leads the Polish branch of MaterCare International, a privately-funded organization that helps women and children in Kenya, Haiti and Ghana.
Fortunately, Professor Chazan is not standing alone in his defense. There is support among lawyers and doctors. The National Board of Medical Doctors supports the conscience clause. Moreover, so far 60,000 people have signed a letter in his defense. In addition, a large crowd appeared in front of the hospital to support the beleaguered doctor. Among them were former patients, such as Karolina Miszkurka, whose child was diagnosed with genetic abnormalities. Furthermore, there is an initiative in Poland to help pay the fine.
In any case, Chazan will appeal the fine. He argues that the $23,000-fine will eat into funds for medical supplies, and that patients will suffer. Chazan called the fine a ransom for the life of the baby he did not abort. This fight goes beyond saving this one particular life. It will have implications for other doctors and for the acceptance of eugenic thinking.
Polish Doctors and Heroes
The eugenics ideology that emerged in the 19th century was never very popular in Catholic Poland. Even when it infected international academia in the 1920s and 1930s, it only became widespread in Poland after the 1939 Nazi invasion. During the German occupation, eugenics was legally practiced by doctors in concentration camps. They simply followed the Third Reichs eugenic laws, and many were not bothered by their consciences. Fortunately, several Polish medical professionals bravely stood up for their beliefs.
For example, psychiatrist Karol Mikulski committed suicide when the Nazis demanded he provide a list of the incurable patients in his hospital. Mikulski knew that the Nazis planned to kill the patients on this list. Another heroic example was Stanisława Leszczyńska, a midwife and prisoner who helped women give birth in Auschwitz. She refused to kill any unborn child, defying the orders of the infamous Nazi abortionist Doctor Mengele. Leszczyńska explained that children cannot be killed under any circumstances. Another Polish Auschwitz prisoner, Doctor Irena Konieczna, refused to follow Nazi law when she was ordered to terminate the pregnancy of each Jewish woman in the camp.
Unlike Professor Chazan, Konieczna was not punished for her refusal to comply with Nazi regulations. It is unfortunate that a doctor living under the Nazi occupation had more freedom of conscience than her counterpart in 21st century free Poland.
Ping!
The left loves abortion. Jihadis love killing. That why leftists love jihadis?
IN every "historically Catholic," prolife country (Poland, Ireland, Spain, Austria, etc.) academia and the media are hysterically anti-Catholic plus pro-Culture of Death.
Why? How does the Left capture these bastions? In every case, the public schools, the Universities, and the even-present, ever-penetrating, ever-persuasive EneMedia are wearing down whole nations' pro-Catholic and pro-Life identities.
I think the Media are worse than an atomic bomb. The Bomb destroyed cities. The Media are destroying souls --- and civilizations.
God bless Dr. Chazan in his trials.
OMG it is Alan Arkin seriously LOL
I wonder what the disability was?
I think I smell the stink of Warren Buffett’s dead wife and all that Berkshire Hathaway abortion money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.