Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Renouncing Jewish Jihad
Townhall.com ^ | July 7, 2014 | Michael Brown

Posted on 07/07/2014 5:23:28 PM PDT by Kaslin

There have been and will continue to be Jewish terrorists who use their religion to justify murder, but the difference between Jewish jihad and Islamic jihad is that only in Islam is jihad a legitimate expression of the faith.

It is true that there have been religious Jews like Baruch Goldstein, who gunned down 29 Muslim worshipers and wounded more than 125 others before being beaten to death in 1994. And it is true that his epitaph reads, “He gave his life for the people of Israel, its Torah and land.”

And it is true that in 2009, an ultra-Orthodox rabbi wrote a book in Hebrew entitled “The King’s Torah,” in which he made outrageous statements like, “Hurting small children makes sense if it's clear that they'll grow up to harm us, and in such a situation – the injury will be directed at them of all people.” And he did this in the name of Jewish law.

And it is true that Jewish extremists in Israel have chanted “Death to the Arabs,” especially in the aftermath of atrocities committed against their own people – especially children – by Muslim terrorists.

And it is true that Yitkhak Ginzburg, an ultra-Orthodox Israeli rabbi, responded to the kidnapping and murder of the three Israeli teenagers with calls for revenge, stating, “Revenge is a natural, spontaneous reaction, and it is led by a feeling that until I find the power to hurt whoever has hurt me I will not experience revival.”

The difference, however, between orthodox expressions of Judaism and orthodox expressions of Islam is that these murderous sentiments and actions represent the rarest exception in Judaism while they represent a common theme in Islam, both in ideology and in practice.

How many organizations are found in Judaism that parallel substantial Muslim groups like Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Boko Haram, or ISIS?

How many religious Jews studying in yeshivas are trained in the art of blowing themselves up with bombs?

How many rabbinic texts (in comparison with Koranic texts) can legitimately be used to justify the murder of innocent people in the name of holy war?

And if Jews are indeed guilty of the kidnapping and horrific murder of a Palestinian teen in revenge for the murder of the Israeli teens, there will be national horror, not jubilation.

As noted by Ben-Dror Yemini, “Here an absolute majority opposes the murder. In the Gaza Strip, Hamas is the government. We have no cries of joy. They have celebrations of joy, and the murderers’ families hand out candy. Here, the state stopped funding the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva [led by the aforementioned Rabbi Ginzburg]. There, the murderers continue to receive regular monthly funding from the Palestinian Authority.”

Again, this is not to say that the people of Israel – my people – are incapable of committing atrocities. And it is not to say that, in coming days, there will not be more and more violent Jewish extremists.

It is simply to say that to do so requires a fundamental violation of many of the tenets of Judaism, while in Islam, such violence can be easily justified.

All that being said, at volatile times like this in the Middle East, we would do well to remember the classic words of Golda Meir spoken to Anwar Sadat: “We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children [meaning, in war]. We will only have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.”

The power of hate, which goes far beyond the call to justice, shows no favoritism and, if not checked, will destroy not only Muslims but also Jews.

Let us then, without reserve or qualification, utterly renounce “Jewish jihad.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: jewish; jihad; stih; terrorism

1 posted on 07/07/2014 5:23:28 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Stance towards homosexuality[edit]

He has been controversial for some of his actions regarding homosexuality. He has argued that a gay Evangelical Christian is something like a traditional Catholic who denies the legitimacy of the papal office, or an Orthodox Jew who believes that pork is kosher. He also states that no new textual, archeological, sociological, anthropological, or philological discoveries that have been made in the last fifty years that would cause us to read any of the biblical texts regarding homosexuality differently. He argues that nothing has changed in terms of what Scripture teaches, which is why almost no one through the centuries has thought to use the Bible to sanction homosexual relationships—that is, until our day, and this is simply the fruit of the sexual revolution of the 1960s, not the fruit of dramatic new insights that would cause us to turn the Bible on its head.[16]

Some of his actions in the Charlotte, North Carolina area have drawn criticism from members of the LGBTQ media, who criticized his decision to march in protest at the 2011 Pride Charlotte Festival.[17] He has debated Eric Smaw[18] and Harry Knox[19] on homosexuality and its relationship to Christianity. He has also appeared on the Piers Morgan program.[20]

Because of his stances on homosexuality, he has been profiled extensively to be among the groups and leaders that the Southern Poverty Law Center considers to be hate groups.[21] In September 2012, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Report named Brown among “30 New Activists Heading Up the Radical Right.”[22]

He has also said in debate with Harry Knox that gays should be treated with respect and dignity.[23]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_L._Brown


2 posted on 07/07/2014 5:27:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Israel needs to stop trying to be so humanitarian with all the terrorist murderers and islamonazis. instead, israel needs to do the logical thing, what any nation would do, and kill them off once and for all.
otherwise, they will just keep bombing and kidnapping and murdering and trying to kill everybody

you either win or you lose, guys

to win, you must DEFEAT the enemy and KEEP them defeated. The best way of doing the latter is to have killed them in the former phase. As any responsible moral national leader or military man knows.


3 posted on 07/07/2014 5:49:47 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Israel needs to do that, yes. But by the fact that they are holding the killers of the Arab boy (in cold blood, burning him) as horrific murderers, the Jews in Israel show that they are civilised human beings who fight against those who can fight back. They do not fight women and children.


4 posted on 07/08/2014 12:34:34 AM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson