Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Amazing Bakken Growth Story Isn't Over Yet
fool.com ^ | July 4, 2014 | By Callum Turcan

Posted on 07/04/2014 8:47:07 AM PDT by ckilmer

Why the Amazing Bakken Growth Story Isn't Over Yet

By Callum Turcan | More Articles
July 4, 2014 | Comments (0)

As many energy investors know, North Dakota's oil production recently surpassed 1 million barrels a day. Does this mean that the growth story is now over and all the best locations have been drilled, or, as downspacing allows oil and gas companies to target the Three-Forks benches just below the Middle Bakken interval, is the growth story still underway? Only time will tell, but Oasis Petroleum (NYSE: OAS  ) is one E&P player trying to shake things up by targeting the deeper Three-Forks formation, and its results look promising. 

More than just the Middle Bakken
During the early years of the shale revolution, oil and gas companies were only tapping into the Middle Bakken bench as it was the most economical. But this wasn't properly utilizing the true potential of the Bakken/Three-Forks play, as the Three-Forks was left just sitting there and not producing. Oasis Petroleum saw the possibilities laying deeper down in North Dakota, so it decided to test out downspacing to see if it could drill into both the Middle Bakken and the Three-Forks benches. 

Downspacing is where oil and gas players reduce the distance between each well so they can bring more wells online in the same amount of space. Oasis Petroleum was successful in its endeavors, as were many other companies, which is why it's planning on completing 30 wells this year targeting the second and third benches of the Three-Forks while also tapping into the Middle Bakken and the first bench of the Three-Forks. 

Production data from current wells targeting the lower Three-Forks intervals look promising, but could be improved. On average these wells have production curves indicative of an EUR (estimated ultimate recovery) between 400,000 BOE (barrels of oil equivalent) and 600,000 BOE. Some wells are outperforming the curve, but there are some wells, like the Bonita, that are producing substantially below the curve. As more wells are brought online that target the lower Three-Forks benches, Oasis Petroleum will be able to leverage its existing knowledge and use better drilling techniques to boost the EUR rates and not produce duds like the Bonita.

Also, if the EUR spread could be improved to 500,000 BOE-600,000 BOE (for example), Oasis Petroleum would be consistently producing a lot more oil per well. Beyond boosting EUR rates, Oasis Petroleum is opening up more drilling locations through downspacing by targeting the lower Three-Forks benches, which increases its recoverable reserves. To take a look at what a bit of expertise can do to well production, look no further than "King Bakken" itself.

The king of downspacing
As the biggest player in the Bakken/Three-Forks play, Continental Resources (NYSE: CLR  ) has been the trend setter for downspacing projects. One example of its expertise being effectively put to work can be found at its Hawkinson project, which had 14 wells tap into four oil producing intervals, ranging from the Middle Bakken down to the Three-Forks. The Three-Forks shale has four benches, three of which were tapped into via the Hawkinson. 

Out of the 14 wells, 13 had production curves that were on average trending 50% above a 603,000 BOE EUR, which means that this method of downspacing couldn't possibly be interfering with production at nearby wells (the biggest concern with downspacing). Continental Resources was also able to show off its ability to utilize better drilling practices to bring more productive wells online in the future. After the Hawkinson produced such amazing results, Continental Resources decided to take it one step further with the Rollefstad project.

The Rollefstad is very similar to the Hawkinson, and the results were just as encouraging. On average, Rollefstad wells tapping into the Middle Bakken and first bench of the Three-Forks (TF1) had IP (initial production) rates of 2,960 BOE/d, versus 1,330 BOE/d for existing Middle Bakken and TF1 wells. For wells targeting the second and third benches of the Three-Forks shale, they had IP rates averaging 2,650 BOE/d.

This is quite amazing and proves that the Bakken/Three-Forks play still has plenty to give operators like Oasis Petroleum and Continental Resources. Some analysts see the growth story slowing down, but with results like these it's hard to see North Dakota giving up without a fight. Continental Resources, due to its size and recent string of successes, will probably keep leading the charge deeper into the Bakken/Three-Forks, with Oasis Petroleum not far behind. 

Foolish conclusion
By perpetually pushing the limits of downspacing, Oasis Petroleum and Continental Resources have been able to prove that the Three-Forks is a very economical play to tap into. As more E&P players tap in the second and third benches of the Three-Forks, those benches will become just as "conventional" as the Middle Bakken itself. One bench is still being left out, and when Continental Resources decides on what kind of pilot projects it wants to embark on next I would hope it attempts to target the fourth Three-Forks interval. 

Naysayers see North Dakota's hydrocarbon driven growth story petering off in a few years time, but as history has proven before, Peak Oil is still a long ways away.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bakken; energy; fracking; threeforks

1 posted on 07/04/2014 8:47:07 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney; bestintxas; Kennard; nuke rocketeer; crusty old prospector; Smokin' Joe

Oasis Petroleum appears to be the second company after Continental to get promising results from the lower benches of Three Forks.


2 posted on 07/04/2014 8:50:49 AM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Was strikes me about this article is that it is written in the language of geologists and entrepreneurs plying their trade to produce oil by leveraging their knowledge, experience, and business instincts to produce something that America needs. Consider what comes out of the mouths of politicians and bureaucrats. None of this, to be sure. What they feed us is environmental dogma devoid of science, technology, and economies and designed soley to further their political power. I think I’ll go with the geologists.


3 posted on 07/04/2014 8:56:57 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I’d like to see the tracer analysis on their interference tests. I bet there is a whole lotta sharing going on.


4 posted on 07/04/2014 9:08:34 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

What have they done to the earth?
What have they done to our fair sister?
Ravaged and plundered and ripped her and bit her
Stuck her with knives in the side of the dawn
And tied her with fences and dragged her down
-Jim Morrison


5 posted on 07/04/2014 9:12:34 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

What have they done to the earth?
..........
Patience.

There’s already 2 companies formed that are surveying the asteroid belt in search of asteroids that have highly profitable elements for mining.

What will happen in the solar system over the next 500 years will be much as what happened to earth over the last 500 years.

Not to put a fine line on things...the world we have today is unsustainable with current technology and resources.

Everything has to be taken up several notches in order to have a successful 21st century.

That is just as coal and steam power of the 19th century displaced water wheels of the 18th century,.... so also in the 20th century internal combustion engines and electric motors displaced steam power of the 19th century. Then again in order to have a successful 21st century the world has to create energy several magnitudes higher than was done in the 20th century.

And it will happen. Just you wait and see.


6 posted on 07/04/2014 9:43:15 AM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler; thackney; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; george76; sergeantdave
Wow!!! How poignant… (sigh)

Nothing like the spritely, upbeat "DRILL BABY, DRILL!!!"

7 posted on 07/04/2014 9:46:48 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Obama is mad! He's getting madder with each crisis and now he's a real MADMAN with no temper left!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The question is, if the world is at war, will any nation be able to do so?


8 posted on 07/04/2014 9:50:41 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The Three Forks has shale in it, but is not a shale. Rather, it is an assembalge of shale, siltstone, sandstone and dolomite, interbedded, and in places, interlaminated.

The Lower Bakken Shale is considered to be the source rock, with the oil having migrated into the Three Forks.

That said, good for Oasis, there is plenty of 'pie' up here, and their success as well as Continental's means more work for us all.

9 posted on 07/04/2014 9:58:38 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

You have nailed it, the perfect emotional appeal to sheer nonsense. It works for those who sell music I suppose. The rest of us need to find something else.


10 posted on 07/04/2014 10:47:18 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: centurion316; Jeff Chandler

Yeah when I was young I used to love Jim Morrison. In fact, I only just barely escaped from that life.

What I missed about the lyrics above when I was young was the sheer arrogance of it. For example for a time you might get polluted skies dirty water or denuded hillsides. But only for a time. People will die. But nature adjusts. Nature is infinitely greater and more powerful than man and God is infinitely greater and more powerful than Nature.


11 posted on 07/04/2014 11:38:43 AM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

The Lower Bakken Shale is considered to be the source rock, with the oil having migrated into the Three Forks.
...............
This is counter intuitive. Why? Because the Three Forks formations are BELOW the Bakken Shale. One would think that the natural direction of oil would be upward toward lower pressure.

Is it the case that the “assembalge of shale, siltstone, sandstone and dolomite, interbedded, and in places, interlaminated” is more porous and/or has a lesser density/pressure than the Bakken shale above.


12 posted on 07/04/2014 2:04:31 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Sure it is counter intuitive. But the Lower Bakken Shale is right there, next to the Three Forks. The pore pressure in the shale is higher than the Three Forks, so the oil goes down section. The State is pretty persnickity about blending oils of different ages, but they have put the Bakken and Three Forks together as a single petroleum system.

But then, anyone in this business can tell you about overpressured zones and lost circulation zones, the former with unusually high pressure, the latter with lower than gradient pressure. It isn't that unusual if you think about it, just in this instance the oil migrated to the porosity in the adjacent lower pressure zone down section.

13 posted on 07/04/2014 7:38:58 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

But then, anyone in this business
........
Well, I’m not in the business. I just find it to be an interesting story.


14 posted on 07/05/2014 6:03:37 AM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

-——I think I’ll go with the geologists.-——

So is Obama.

Without doubt geologist’s optimism is affording him the political protection required to allow him to obstruct the Keystone.


15 posted on 07/05/2014 6:10:36 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

“This is counter intuitive. Why? Because the Three Forks formations are BELOW the Bakken Shale. One would think that the natural direction of oil would be upward toward lower pressure.”

Listen to Smoking Joe- he is correct.

Between the two shales the Bakken is supercharged due to hydrocarbon maturation.

At least 2,000 psi above the ThreeForks.

Expelled oil will go downward from Lower Shale


16 posted on 07/07/2014 7:26:21 AM PDT by bestintxas (Every time a RINO bites the dust a founding father gets his wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson