Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hieronymus

Your analysis is sadly correct. ANY pro-American decision can be overturned at any time. We thought we’d effectively beat the Sodomy lobby after Bowers V Harwick, but then we saw the disgusting Lawrence V Texas case.

I have seen the presumed nominees Obama is thinking of for the SCOTUS (all of whom are women), one is the dumbass senator from Minnesota and the other a Marxist Californian black supremacist.

Now, I personally don’t see him getting these opportunities, because Ginsburg is resistant to retiring, and despite how pathetic the Repukes are, they are likely to take the senate.... but let’s remember that 2016 is a horrible year for Republicans in terms of senate opportunities, and the establishment will force another moderate slime to lose another presidential election.

These are the worst of times, and we need the 2nd Amendment now more than ever. The Democrats have become an openly socialist anti-constitutional party, and we have heard the threats from all their chosen constituencies whether its Farakhan’s promise to curb-stomp blue eyed babies, Dan Savage’s desire to rape conservatives, or that Climatard’s promise to throw enemies in jail, we are years away from a French-style ‘Great Terror’.

When you tell your children about America, tell them it is right now under attack.


10 posted on 07/03/2014 10:49:20 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Viennacon

But, the current senate voted that a 50% majority is needed for confirmation. If that stays as is, and we have the senate...then the minority can’t block a new SCOTUS appointment.

In other words, if we get a conservative president, he can easily replace any retiring liberal judge with a conservative one. This presumes of course that the Senate will not change the rules back to needing 66% passage.


24 posted on 07/04/2014 3:36:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Viennacon
Now, I personally don’t see him getting these opportunities

Then you presume he's ruled out kinetic action?

I'm not so sure.

25 posted on 07/04/2014 3:42:01 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Viennacon

When engaging your U.S. Rep or Senatorial candidate, one question to ask is, “Will you firmly commit to blocking ALL and ANY appointments made by this out of control executive branch?”.

If the candidate give any other answer than straight-to-the-point affirmative, let them know that you consider them traitorous, and intend to stand firmly with the majority of American while you wage complete and total jihad on their campaign.


37 posted on 07/04/2014 8:12:55 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Viennacon

This is why we need to win back the Senate, AND get a win in the White House in 2016.


38 posted on 07/04/2014 8:38:13 AM PDT by ksm1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson