Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/01/2014 8:54:23 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh

I agree. What constitutes “bullying”? Mere criticism?


2 posted on 07/01/2014 8:58:02 AM PDT by rusty schucklefurd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

If it’s going to be so “tricky” to write such a law, then don’t. Not every problem needs a government solution.


4 posted on 07/01/2014 9:15:29 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Politicians would love such a law. Any criticism at all would be “bullying.”


7 posted on 07/01/2014 9:21:22 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Everyone “knows” what bullying is, just like loitering and jostling. Problem is that it’s impossible to write a law that defines them clearly and unambiguously.
Liberals love to write laws as long as the laws restrict freedom.


9 posted on 07/01/2014 9:32:51 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

When the eighth grader here told us it would be so bad like death ifvface book wasn’t available along wth a good phone, the kind everyone at school had even and especially the poor ones on the breakfast program, the answer was No

In middle school, kids need to learn how to approach other people. To verbalized ideas. To get others’ immediate reaction in the form of facial expression. They need supportif friends criticism as well as defense

And they need at that time to be out and about not sitting, getting fat and typing conversations

So no phone just the ‘loser phone’ for contacting us

This did not sit well

We said yes you can have all this stuff later

Facebook is not for middle schoolers nor is surfing the net

And I wanted to know very well who was coming and going around here and what was being talked about

My friends said I could spy on the kids looking at the search history

Not only was there not enough time in the day for that, and no I am mot spying on my kids, if I’m strong enough to do that I’m strong enough to just say no, but it would be after tfe fact and what do I do with the info? Take away Facebook? I thought is save the trouble and do it then

Not great but they could see the reason so they knew it wasn’t punishment or torture for the sake of power

Then there was the slew of stories - girls getting into problems for se ting, the bullying, the lack of social skills

We pulled them out of that system and into a private school the next year where parents were paying multi thousands for education to not fool around and had no money for all the electronics and there was no government money for all of it

End of issue. But it’s a big issue

As long as people continue to think that somehow Facebook is ok for middle schoolers

Don’t they have schoolwork to do?

Now there’s every electronic gadget known, here.

And they are all treated as what they are - tools

People vote for Obama. They let their kids play with dangerous things

Lots of stupidity out there. I’m not joining

Freedom of speech needs to be treated with respect not pulled in because parents are senseless


12 posted on 07/01/2014 10:28:34 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I’d argue cyber bullying laws not only violate the 1st amendment, they provide a backdoor to completely circumvent it.

Call a politician a moron on a forum and they would file a butt hurt report in a minute claiming you were bullying them.


16 posted on 07/01/2014 10:34:36 AM PDT by IamConservative (If fighting fire with fire is a good idea, why do the pros use water?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson