Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2014 9:01:02 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

Here is hoping that at least a few on SCOTUS are still Americans and still interesting in upholding the Constitution. I’m getting to the point where I have less and less hope.


2 posted on 06/29/2014 9:11:57 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“emergency contraception”= the morning after pill—abortion.


3 posted on 06/29/2014 9:15:43 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Not expecting a good outcome. Abortion is popular. Immorality is rampant. Murder is acceptable. All this in the new America.


4 posted on 06/29/2014 9:23:45 AM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; All
As mentioned in related threads, please consider the following.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Regarding questions of the constitutionality for any official federal government action, the first thing that the Supreme Court needs to look at is if the states have delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to justify such action. And since this case involves both intrastate labor and intrastate healthcare, please note the following.

With the exception of the federal entities indicated in the Constutution's Clauses 16 & 17 as examples, entities under the exclusive legislative control of Congress, the states have never delgated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate either intrastate labor or intrastate healthcare. In fact, here are historcal Supreme Court clarifications that the states have never delegated to the feds the specific power to legislatively address healthcare issues.

It remains that all three branches of the unconstitutionally big federal government are corrupt. So I'm bracing myself for more perversions of the Constitution by activist justices regarding the Court's decision in this case.

9 posted on 06/29/2014 11:27:48 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

Tomorrow is the last day of this SCOTUS term. Orders are at 9:30, opinions are at 10:00. We'll get Harris v. Quinn and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. Perdogg will try to put a live thread in breaking news and I'll ping you to it. (Thanks, Perdogg!) As always, SCOTUS Blog will be live-blogging. Stay tuned for a big day tomorrow.

10 posted on 06/29/2014 1:18:36 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I hope and pray for Conestoga Wood to win this suit.


11 posted on 06/29/2014 2:03:17 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I guess some of these small companies can simply shut down


12 posted on 06/29/2014 2:04:29 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson