Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Ruling Could Force NLRB to Revisit Up to 800 Cases
Daily Signal ^ | June 27, 2014 | Elisabeth Slattery

Posted on 06/27/2014 6:44:40 PM PDT by lbryce

Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling that President Obama’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were unconstitutional could mean as many as 800 cases decided by the illegal appointees would have to be reconsidered.

The Court ruled three appointments President Obama made on Jan. 4, 2012, to fill out the five-member National Labor Relations Board, were improper because the Senate was not, in fact, in recess. That means the NLRB did not have a quorum, as required by law, when it ruled on hundreds of cases from the time they were appointed until August 2013, when other nominees were properly confirmed by the Senate and sworn in as members. This, in turn, calls into question all the decisions the NLRB rendered during that time.

Richard Cordray, the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, was appointed the same day and under the same circumstances as the NLRB appointees. But Cordray later was later confirmed by the Senate, and he subsequently ratified the agency’s actions taken while he served as a recess appointee.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nlrb; obama; scotus; unconstitutional
So when will these nine nincompoops declare Obama's sorry chute unconstitutional?
1 posted on 06/27/2014 6:44:40 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

It is utterly incompetent of this SCOTUS (no real surprise) not to have addressed this in the ruling and yes they could have.


2 posted on 06/27/2014 6:45:56 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

It’ll take them an afternoon to affirm all the decisions.


3 posted on 06/27/2014 6:56:59 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

That’s right.

No one believes this will change anything already done.


4 posted on 06/27/2014 7:12:44 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Sadly most of the damage is already done, business are already belly up, or killed before they ever could have gotten started. Revising will only revive the more hardy and help fix things in the future.


5 posted on 06/27/2014 7:38:21 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

So the entire cost associated with all of this will come out of Obama’s Salary- Right? Or least take it out of the white house budget.


6 posted on 06/27/2014 8:01:07 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This is all about Unions.........


7 posted on 06/28/2014 4:36:05 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

8 posted on 06/28/2014 5:56:17 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson