Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UNANIMOUS! Supreme Court Rules Obama’s ‘Recess’ Appointments UNCONSTITUTIONAL
TPN ^ | 6/26/2014 | Matthew Burke

Posted on 06/26/2014 9:25:49 AM PDT by Marie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Gabrial

*He broke the law. Give him a fair trial and a fair sentence to be served in a federal prison. *

Orange overalls in his future?


41 posted on 06/26/2014 10:13:14 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gabrial
He broke the law. Give him a fair trial and a fair sentence to be served in a federal prison.

The trial as to whether the president broke the law or not has concluded 9-0 he is GUILTY of a high crime, not a misdemeanor.

Impeachment should be an automatic process at this point.

42 posted on 06/26/2014 10:14:23 AM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marie

This marks the twelfth time since January 2012 that the Supreme Court has unanimously rejected the Obama Administration’s calls for greater federal executive power.


43 posted on 06/26/2014 10:14:36 AM PDT by TheMom (Stressed spelled backwards is Desserts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie
There's a lot of good stuff out there today! 9-0! He broke the law.

Great! When do they perp-walk his hiness and corrupt band of thugs out of our whitehouse?

44 posted on 06/26/2014 10:14:59 AM PDT by infool7 (The ugly truth is just a big lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
9-0 on ANYTHING is pretty astonishing!

The decision was 9-0 that these particular appointments were invalid, but the grounds of the decision were WAY narrower than the lower court.

The D.C. Circuit had held that the recess appointment power can only be used during the recess between one Congress and another (not during recesses in the middle of one Congress), and only if the vacancy happens during that recess. That decision would have, in effect, ended the recess appointment power entirely. (It also meant that all of the recess appointments made during the past 100 years were unconstitutional.)

Today's decision just says that the President can't make a recess appointment at a time when the Senate says it's in session. It strikes down these appointments, but leaves Obama and future presidents much more room for making recess appointments than the lower court would have.

45 posted on 06/26/2014 10:16:41 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Marie

You do know that Obama will just double down on stupid now


46 posted on 06/26/2014 11:01:58 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

how can this be, wasn’t Obama a teacher of the Constitution at the college level?


47 posted on 06/26/2014 11:18:59 AM PDT by fish hawk (no tyrant can remain in power without the consent and cooperation of his victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabrial
He broke the law. Give him a fair trial and a fair sentence to be served in a federal prison.

That the Supreme Court found some governmental action to be unconstitutional is not the same thing as saying that someone is guilty of a crime. Or do you think that every member of Congress who voted for the Defense of Marriage Act belongs in prison?

48 posted on 06/26/2014 11:29:08 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Many people think that WWII got us out of the Depression. Others point to Supreme Court rulings against some of FDR’s New Deal policies and a Republican Congress before we got involved in the war to be key. Everything else obama has done has been eerily similar to FDR (see the long article in my tagline). Hopefully the end will be similar as well, with this ruling as a start.


49 posted on 06/26/2014 11:36:05 AM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Marie
"UNANIMOUS! Supreme Court Rules Obama’s ‘Recess’ Appointments UNCONSTITUTIONAL."

.... So ... When did Obama ever care if he adheres to the Constitution. And what happens next ....do the appointees stay?

50 posted on 06/26/2014 11:53:26 AM PDT by R_Kangel ( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
for the foreseeable future

Actually til 2018, when their current terms expire ... that's when it will get interesting ...

51 posted on 06/26/2014 12:58:51 PM PDT by 11th_VA (Decriminalize Tax Evasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
Something tells me even the libs on the court are starting to fear a dictatorship and the inevitable response from the People.


52 posted on 06/26/2014 1:29:43 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Marie

You are delusional if you think a Republican Senate is going to impeach zero. McConnell has never stood up once against the DEMS and I don’t expect him to to anything if the Republicans win back the Senate either. He’s an a** kisser for the regime, and can only fight against conservatives.


53 posted on 06/26/2014 1:50:31 PM PDT by Catsrus (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Marie

BTTT!


54 posted on 06/26/2014 6:06:20 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

“That the Supreme Court found some governmental action to be unconstitutional is not the same thing as saying that someone is guilty of a crime. Or do you think that every member of Congress who voted for the Defense of Marriage Act belongs in prison?”

I never said he committed a crime. I said he broke the law. To be more specific Constitutional law, which is the body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. This has nothing to do with criminal law.


55 posted on 06/27/2014 11:23:12 AM PDT by Gabrial (The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Gabrial
I never said he committed a crime. I said he broke the law.

Then why did you say he should be sentenced to federal prison?

56 posted on 06/27/2014 11:42:42 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Personally I have no interest where he is incarcerated. Just that he is.


57 posted on 06/27/2014 11:58:33 AM PDT by Gabrial (The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson