We should have abolished the SCOTUS during the Warren Court. Think how much better off we would be.
And I hope you would have had a revolution at hand and some sort of supra-martial law.
A bad court is usually still better than no court.
Don’t point at the court; point at the entities named at the top of the Constitution. Riiiiight, We The People.
They had called God into their situation at the founding, and the result was good although still flawed (chattel slavery anyone?).
Without continuing to do this, the country was bound to lapse into more and more evil.
Also how do we not know that certain memebers of the court are not being blackmailed by some of the more unscrupulous members of the espionage beer-o-cracy....????
“We should have abolished the SCOTUS during the Warren Court. Think how much better off we would be.”
Indeed if you want justice and constitutional law, you can’t depend upon the employees of the criminals to uphold it, less that ‘law’ becomes a weapon of assault against the people rather than the chains of restraint for the state.
SCOTUS exercises an heavy biased hand anytime it try’s to resolve a federal Constitutional question. As it is always reliably the hand picked member of one of the disputing parties.
If you expect to uphold any law, an impartial 3rd party must always weigh in over the dispute, SCOTUS being one of 3 branches of the Federal Government has always favored itself in disputes, and is not a legitimate arbitrator in such disputes.
If there is to be justice, then the only party capable of resolving such disputes over a Constitution are the very parties that created and empowered that constitution in the first place. If there is to be a court, its members must be directly selected by the States. Perhaps in accordance to their respective judicial philosophic. Furthermore such a court recognizing the people and theirs states as the origins of all legitimate power must do the utomost to respect their local ability to govern.