Phase 2: pretend to not understand the issue and instead argue something unconnected to it logically; in short, play dumb. Using long sentences with complicated structure helps in that mimicry.
See explanation of phases of Protestant obfuscation here.
See, this is why your "apologetic" must fail. That is a patently false accusation. I have understood it exactly the way Daniel understands it. This understanding is both honest, and I believe friendlier to the text. Do you honestly think God will bless a ministry founded on false accusation? Yes, we disagree. The disagreement is REAL. We really SEE it the way we're saying it. There is no pretense here. I urge you to reconsider this approach. It violates the rules of the forum (making it personal) and it violates common decency, without which you have no chance of making a case with fair-minded individuals. Not that I want you to. Your system is fatally defective. Who I am sad for are the lurkers. There might be atheists, or Muslims, or literal pagans looking over these pages. I am embarrassed on their behalf that such vile discourse is associated in any way with the name of Christ.