If this is true, why are we allowing so many illegal alien "children" into the U.S. to "escape the gun violence" in Central America? Duh? Why are they coming here? Are they stupid or what?
So shooting men is ok?
By taking guns away from their hookups.
“Every day 5 women are murdered with guns in the United States”.
I see no mention of the thousands that are murdered in the womb every day. I guess they don’t count.
Teach a woman to shoot - Today.
Empowering women to fight back is a hell of a lot more effective.
Men SHOULD attend, and offer to train/teach any woman who shows up. Right outside the conference, set up a booth, hand out flyers, offer free shooting and safety lessons.
The NRA and other organizations should be all over these kind of events.
“a large percentage”
Meaning? 10%? 25%? 50%?
Oh, let me guess... even one percent is too many to allow me to continue owning a gun, right?
The Dems are back to the divide and conquer strategy. I bet there are far more men who die from “gun violence” (since a lot more men are gang bangers). The truth is that from a potential victim standpoint, guns are more important to women as a tool for self-defense than to men as women are on average physically weaker and slower (running) than men, and are therefore more likely to be victims of just about all criminal activities. As such guns are the great equalizer for their self-defense, and these A-holes want to take that away from them so they would go back to being helpless. They make me puke.
More gun laws?
If laws worked the US President wouldn’t be a dope smoking, cocaine sniffing illegal alien.
By far, the *very best* way of “Protecting Women from Gun Violence”, is to give them guns!
And that is real feminism.
This should be thrown in the face of the gun controllers. That by their wanting to disarm women, they are calling women inferior to men. Barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen baking pies for the men. Too weak to open a door, or to pull out their own chair to sit down to dinner.
Timid and frightened of wildflowers, because they are wild. Who faint at the sound of a bad word. Who need men to protect them, because they cannot protect themselves, and are frightened of mice and loud noises.
If you respect women, you know they are capable of defending themselves when they are armed. A woman with a gun can protect herself from a muscular psychopath bent on rape and murder. No help needed at all, except to police up the criminal’s body.
And as is usual with the left, it remains unsaid that most of the guns involved were illegal in the first place, and the vast majority of the vics (and the perps) were black. Something like 3/4 (maybe more) of all gun violence disappears if you don’t count black-perp violence.
How many of these "intimate partners" are thug felons?
You would lower the death rate by convincing women to not live with thugs. But it would be hard because thugs are so much more "exciting" and "sexy" than marrying a WalMart manager.
“Every day, five women are murdered with guns in the United States, a large percentage of whom are killed by their intimate partners.”
Thank goodness there were no guns present in my household!!!
Nicole Brown Simpson (dec)
Let's see the numbers!
A). The implicational LIE that there are virtually no laws on the books on guns.
B). Lying by statistics to score whatever political points they can to Forward their gun grabbing agenda.
The ‘Loose Laws Lie’ has been repeatedly used to attack our Commonsense Civil Rights by the following method:
Step one: Repeatedly scream that ‘gun violence’ is casued by the ‘easy access to guns’.
Step two: Get whatever laws they can on the books in response to the latest incident - and then say it’s a good “First Step”.
Go back to step one, rinse lather repeat……
Back up the process with Lies based on statistics..
http://www.avpress.com/page.php?page=58
Concise, rational comments welcome here...
My comments on the topic:
“Nearly every mass shooting incident in the last twenty years, and multiple other instances of suicide and isolated shootings all share one thing in common, and it’s not the weapons used. It has been shown that many of the mass shooters were on powerful psychotropic drugs or had been taking them at some point in the immediate past just prior to their crimes.
SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior.
What are these drugs doing? What are the side effects while on them? Another common denominator that no one wants to mention is the vast majority of these shooters were democrats…
In addition, we have state legislatures, corrupt representatives (Yee, Pelosi, Boxer and Feinstein) and the buffoons in Washington doing all they can to disarm sane and law abiding citizens, making us all sitting ducks for these mental cases. I wonder what all those fools have in common. A big fat D after their name.
So there are common themes here; SSRI drugs, democrats or some version of anarchist doing most of the shootings and democrats trying to disarm us…hmmmm. Nope, nothing to see here…it’s got to be the guns. Yep, the guns are the problem.”
"Would it make you fell any better, little girl, if they was pushed outta windows?"
- Archie Bunker
Any time you seen the term “gun violence” used, expect it to be from someone who has a gun-grabber mentality who does not really care about violent crime in general. The UK has higher violent crime rates than we do, for instance, and considerably so. This apparently doesn’t matter to the “gun violence” crowd.
Larry Elder says that women who are for gun control is like chickens cheering for Colonel Sanders.
Thanks but I think I’ll clean my handgun instead. :-)