[nikos1121]

You know, can I throw something out here? I really hope that I’m not hearing what I think I’m hearing.

Here’s the deal. YOu fight the fight, you do your best for your candidate, then what ever the outcome, we draw ranks and support the most electable conservative candidate. We don’t sit home and pout. The objective is to win the senate.

[Paladin2]

Cochran LOST, he needs to stand down to show us how it is done.

[nickcarraway]

Like in 2010, when Cornyn deliberately threw the Senate and backed Democrats?

[GeronL]

Not any more.

We no longer will support the enemies of conservatism of either party.

[JRandomFreeper]

The objective is to win the senate.

That's your objective. Mine is to destroy liberal republicans, so that if they do regain the Senate, they govern in a conservative manner.

Lord knows they haven't governed in a conservative manner when they've had the majority before.

Besides, Mitch has said he'll reach out to the Dems, and make it easier for them to block conservative legislation if he wins (questionable) and if the pubs win the Senate.

Personally, I hope Mitch loses the general election.

/johnny

[petitfour]

I remember winning the Senate during the Bush years. Trent Lott went on a morning show the next day and talked about conservative issues. Then the Bush people went ape and ran him right out of DC at the earliest opportunity. They only want yes people in their club.

[Carry_Okie]

Here’s the deal. YOu fight the fight, you do your best for your candidate, then what ever the outcome, we draw ranks and support the most electable conservative candidate.

Funny, the RINOs don't do that.

We don’t sit home and pout.

RINOs do worse than that, actively sabotaging conservative nominees from their own Party.

The objective is to win the senate.

For whom? If the RINOs are allying with Democrats against us, isn't it obvious that they will govern the same way? Why then earn the blame for the results because of a "Republican majority"? Didn't you see what happened in 2006 and 2008?

I think we should look at this on a case-by-case basis. McConnell has now shown himself to be so bad that he may need defeating, as his continued presence in the Senate could well be worse than an ineffectual idiot like Grimes. I don't want conservatives owning the blame for a RINOcrat government.

[Taxman]

That is precisely why Karl Rove is on my shit list!

[Reddy]

Here’s the deal.

If you are a democrat/liberal I won’t vote for you. If you are a republican/Rino I won’t vote for you. If you are a conservative, I will vote for you.

Rush’s replacement today was talking about how people say there was no difference between romney and zero. He believes that isn’t true, and we wouldn’t have obamacare if romney had been elected. Does he not know that romney is the father of obamacare?? Yes, the difference is that it is at the state not federal level, but still, the states are implementing obamacare anyway! The idiot governor of Ohio went along with it!

No more holding my nose to vote for the least worst person. If there is no conservative on the ballot, I am writing in the name of one.

[grania]

We don't win the Senate if McConnell is needed to make the majority. If McConnell is sent packing it sends a strong message to all the other backstabbing entrenched DC crowd. It's way out of line for him in his leadership role to take sides in the run off.

We'll be better off if we get McDaniels and a reasonable dem Senator from KY than if we're stuck with McConnell and Cocharan.

[Timber Rattler]

No way. No more voting for backstabbing RINOs. I hope Grimes beats Mitch in Kentucky. The GOP-E can go to hell!

[COBOL2Java]

Here’s the deal. YOu fight the fight, you do your best for your candidate, then what ever the outcome, we draw ranks and support the most electable conservative candidate. We don’t sit home and pout. The objective is to win the senate.

But then why are you so desperate, that you're willing to actively support our enemies? Are you that blind?