Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer
"A prudent man would have foreseen what was coming back before the..." 1934 National Firearms Act.

The point is, they didn't care about anyone owning them in '34 or '94. The intent each time was to whittle down each generations rights and brainwash each successive generation with a total ban in, lets say, 2024, when all of the prudent men are gone.

37 posted on 06/05/2014 8:35:21 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (Obama: Evincing a Design since 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: gnarledmaw

You’re right. But you have to deal with what you have. In most states you aren’t restricted as to ownership. You may have to jump through some hoops, but you can still get them in the midst of doing your vehement best in working to destroy the apparatus that seeks to limit your rights.


38 posted on 06/05/2014 8:37:43 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: gnarledmaw

They didn’t care in ‘34, ‘68, ‘86, or ‘94.

I feel the farming laws are unconstitutional. Those go further back than firearms laws. The government has been stepping over its bounds for well over 100 years. I won’t get into the Civil War.


79 posted on 06/06/2014 11:23:28 PM PDT by wastedyears (I'm a pessimist, I say plenty of negative things. Consider it a warning of sorts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson