Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia and China Just Signed An Energy Deal. Why You Should be Scared.
Heritage Foundation ^ | May 31, 2014 | Stephen Moore

Posted on 05/31/2014 6:39:03 AM PDT by 1rudeboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: 1rudeboy

A coalition between Russia and China with a candy-a$$ed administration like we have now and are likely to have again if Hillary is immaculated spells total disaster for the west and civilized society.


21 posted on 05/31/2014 7:50:56 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

A sure thing if hitlery gets in.


22 posted on 05/31/2014 7:52:18 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Not just 0bama but the whole Democrat party. The lot of them are bad for America.


23 posted on 05/31/2014 8:02:44 AM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

To look at this with fear alone is foolish. At least the tiger won’t be as hungry for food.


24 posted on 05/31/2014 8:08:25 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Spiritual revival going on in China, too.


25 posted on 05/31/2014 8:31:51 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
There is little reason for the US to view the new Russia-China pipeline as a threat and it may well, on the net, prove to work toward our benefit.

First of all, the new pipeline will take many years to build, and of its capital cost of $55 billion, some $30 billion is to be raised by Gazprom. This will strain both Gazprom and the Russian treasury and limit what other projects and mischief they can undertake.

Moreover, the inevitable delays and corruption that attend such projects will test and may sour the Russia-China relationship. Similarly, Russia is inclined to use energy exports as a political weapon and tends to be heavy handed about it. This is likely to antagonize the increasingly proud and prickly Chinese.

Finally, the project will supplant oil that China now imports from petrostates in the Mid East. Since Iran is first on that list, the new pipeline does not token well for the Iranian regime.

26 posted on 05/31/2014 9:14:24 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
Finally, the project will supplant oil that China now imports from petrostates in the Mid East. Since Iran is first on that list, the new pipeline does not token well for the Iranian regime.

Also considering the US will soon be a net exporter of oil, the entire OPEC organization is going to be seeing demand heading south with a bullet. Which just breaks my little heart. /s

27 posted on 05/31/2014 9:18:23 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Face it!!!! The government in DC is full of treasonous bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

The US import over 7,500,000 barrels of oil per day. We are not going to be a net exporter of oil anytime soon.


28 posted on 05/31/2014 9:42:18 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com had some story re the trading deal stipulates that payment will not be in U.S. dollars.


29 posted on 05/31/2014 9:45:57 AM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Maybe I should have been a little more clear around this point. I meant energy instead of crude. And as you can see, we are probably a net exporter by about 2018. I have also seen API articles which guess this event will take place more like 2020. I guess it is how you define "soon"

In any case, we are already putting a serious dent in the bottom line of OPEC, so my premise stands.


30 posted on 05/31/2014 2:39:42 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Face it!!!! The government in DC is full of treasonous bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

There is also a technological wild card in the works in the form of a small, practical “cold fusion” device known as an E-Cat. Supposedly, E-Cats use a metal catalyst and low energy nuclear reactions to convert dollops of electricity and hydrogen into a large quantity of heat. Although much doubted, E-Cat technology is being intensively researched and developed by several companies, with a US venture capital fund backing the most prominent design. Who knows, but a simple and impossible device may bring our era of fossil fuels to a close.


31 posted on 05/31/2014 3:34:05 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

I think the headline is pretty subdued given the deal between China and Russia is far more reaching than the piece of paper Hitler and Stalin plaid on.


32 posted on 06/01/2014 12:07:00 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

I see that deal as a matter of mutual economic survival, not conquest.


33 posted on 06/01/2014 12:33:45 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson