Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health insurance choices for small business
onlinw version of Intelligencer Journal/Lancaster ^ | Posted: Saturday, May 24, 2014 7:00 pm | Updated: 9:10 pm, Sat May 24, 2014. | By TIM STUHLDREHER | Business Writer

Posted on 05/26/2014 7:31:31 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2

Second of a two part series. Part 1 is here.)

When Zimmerman Industries’ health insurance came up for renewal this year, its carrier was more than willing to continue its existing coverage.

Provided, that is, Zimmerman paid double the previous premium: 100.4 percent more, to be exact.

(Excerpt) Read more at lancasteronline.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: freedom; obamacar
i thot this was interesting in that the size of the company is small and is now self insured based on a stop loss policy that is pooled with other companies to keep the cost down. excellent way to get around obamacare.
1 posted on 05/26/2014 7:31:31 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

What I am doing in my 100 employee operation is telling them to go get insurance on obamacare. I give them the amount I gave before minus the penalty and that’s it. I pay not 1 cent more. And their reimbursement goes down as the penalty goes up. And if they don’t like it, I tell them to vote republican.


2 posted on 05/26/2014 7:43:42 PM PDT by SADMILLIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

Any semblance of a free market is gone in this sector of the economy. I have no idea how this can be fixed.


3 posted on 05/26/2014 7:52:14 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SADMILLIE

Assuming you’ve taken this into account: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3160323/posts


4 posted on 05/26/2014 7:53:56 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SADMILLIE

I truly hope that strategy works for you. I just read an article that has me a little concerned, though. It basically states that in addition to the fine, there is an excise tax of $36,500 per employee. It doesn’t say how many employees a company must have to meet that requirement. http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obamacare-employers-IRS-taxes/2014/05/26/id/573326/


5 posted on 05/26/2014 7:56:44 PM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

It’s not part of the exchange. It is insurance that the company underwrites directly for it’s employees. Insurance companies can process the claims for a fee. the stop loss provisions are what insurance companies have reserves for. The reserves would not be practical for a regular business. thus the stop loss policy.


6 posted on 05/26/2014 7:58:02 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2
Due to the fact that my employer offered a "gold plated Cadillac" plan, they had to drop it due to the 40% tax that Obamacare would force on them. My company managed to keep the rates low, however my deductible quadrupled, from $500 to $2000, and my maximum out of pocket more than tripled, from $1500 to $4600.

Oh, and did anyone else notice that a part of Obamacare was a tinkering with the tax code, that jacked up the minimum medical expenses to 10% before you can begin deducting the expenses?

Mark

7 posted on 05/26/2014 8:17:39 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SADMILLIE
After five years of the federal government telling the public that despite a $3.5 trillion increase in monetary expansion, the inflation rate is below +2%

You might be headed for trouble. Obama just rewrote the law again:

I.R.S. Bars Employers From Dumping Workers Into Health Exchanges

8 posted on 05/26/2014 8:22:46 PM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

* Alaska: Begich (D-AK), Yea
* Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Yea Pryor (D-AR), Yea
* California: Boxer (D-CA), Yea Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
* Colorado: Bennet (D-CO), Yea Udall (D-CO), Yea
* Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Yea Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
* Delaware: Carper (D-DE), Yea Kaufman (D-DE), Yea
* Florida: Nelson (D-FL), Yea
* Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Yea Inouye (D-HI), Yea
* Illinois: Burris (D-IL), Yea Durbin (D-IL), Yea
* Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Yea
* Iowa: Harkin (D-IA), Yea
* Kentucky: Bunning (R-KY), Not Voting
* Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
* Maryland: Cardin (D-MD), Yea Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
* Massachusetts: Kerry (D-MA), Yea Kirk (D-MA), Yea
* Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Yea Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
* Minnesota: Franken (D-MN), Yea Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
* Missouri: McCaskill (D-MO), Yea
* Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Yea Tester (D-MT), Yea
* Nebraska: Nelson (D-NE), Yea
* Nevada: Reid (D-NV), Yea
* New Hampshire: Shaheen (D-NH), Yea
* New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea Menendez (D-NJ), Yea
* New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM), Yea Udall (D-NM), Yea
* New York: Gillibrand (D-NY), Yea Schumer (D-NY), Yea
* North Carolina: Hagan (D-NC), Yea
* North Dakota: Conrad (D-ND), Yea Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
* Ohio: Brown (D-OH), Yea
* Oregon: Merkley (D-OR), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Yea
* Pennsylvania: Casey (D-PA), Yea Specter (D-PA), Yea
* Rhode Island: Reed (D-RI), Yea Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
* South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD), Yea
* Vermont: Leahy (D-VT), Yea Sanders (I-VT), Yea
* Virginia: Warner (D-VA), Yea Webb (D-VA), Yea
* Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Murray (D-WA), Yea
* West Virginia: Byrd (D-WV), Yea Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
* Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Yea Kohl (D-WI), Yea


9 posted on 05/26/2014 9:50:08 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2; SADMILLIE

I fully understand the stop-loss method as a way for companies to address insurance and believe it’s an effective approach to a tough situation. I didn’t perceive SADMILLIE’s approach to be stop-loss so, if I misunderstood that post, I apologize. I took it to be the approach that has resulted in problems with the IRS, as described in the article I linked.


10 posted on 05/27/2014 3:19:17 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

no my mistake — you were replying to him i thot you were replying to me. and yes you were correct in pointing out that the IRS will target the escapees.


11 posted on 05/27/2014 3:42:35 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson