Posted on 05/21/2014 6:34:02 AM PDT by Mozilla
Seinfeld’s Soup Nazi was downright benevolent compared to the Lunch Nazi:
Sounding a new aggressive tone, first lady Michelle Obama vowed in a private conference call Monday to fight industry efforts at rolling back healthy school-lunch standards, an issue that could come up for a vote on Capitol Hill this week.
It isn’t just “industry” that doesn’t want the national menu dictated by the Bitter Half. The kids who have to eat the widely caboosed authoritarian’s notion of healthy meals don’t like it either. Even liberal New York City dropped her school lunch scheme after determining it to be a total failure, both practically and financially.
The first lady has made child health, including nutrition and exercise, a priority since her husband took office in 2009. But her “Let’s Move” campaign has come under criticism from lawmakers and health activists, who say she has shifted from an emphasis on food policy to exercise. They have suggested this was done at the urging of the food industry. The criticism was reflected in a recently released documentary on the food industry, “Fed Up.”
It could be that the increased costs and massive waste of uneaten food entailed in the mandated standards are a price the Worst Lady is willing for us to pay to polish up her image. She can’t have her fellow moonbats accusing her of being in the pockets of capitalist exploiters — even though pressure was already exerted to force the makers of Fed Up to tone down their criticism.
Playground liability,
Interferes with socialist indoctrination,
Competitive games injure self-esteem.....
Well said, actually.
Doubling down on failure is the hallmark of this administration............................
Maybe she should just give all that WHOLE WHEAT, LOW-whatever, Gluten Free, Non-sodium stuff to the starving people around the world our parents used to warn us about if we left anything on our plate.
At least we would be making more 'allies' for the US. And I bet it would cost us less to just give it away to them.
So well said that it was removed as, what, inflammatory?
I guess. I thought it was tame, but I am not a moderator.
I can't agree with calling them lunch Nazis though. I understand the term is very popular in public discussion, but... the actual German children under the Nazi regime were very fit.
Unelected
not a govt official
not a govt employee
Does not belong in America
Send her to Africa to the cannibals for lunch which they will barf.
What do you suppose that broad beamed hag has for lunch?
Just flip her the bird and ignore the walrus-lookin’ bitch.
They can't go outside to play because the nation has become feminist.
Now that the nation is feminist, there are no mothers at home to supervise play.
They can't go outside to play because the nation has become multicultural.
Now that the nation is multicultural, other cultures believe it is okay to ignore -- or flout -- the Ten Commandments.
Children are not safe on the streets and in back yards.
Children are not safe because the helpful ACLU has determined that pornography is protected speech, and now the nation is awash in pornography.
Children are not safe because pornographers and child sex abusers get out on bail, get light sentences if any, get out in time to reoffend, and their victims get blamed.
Children are not safe because schools advocate sexual permissiveness and fail to step in to prevent bullying and rape -- unless it is for the protected fictional class, "gay children."
Children are not safe because powerful unions and liberal judges have stolen the rights of parents, preventing them from protecting their children from emotional, sexual and physical abuse in schools.
Children are not safe because when parents try to protect their children from abuse in or by a school, they are bullied, legally banished or arrested.
Children are not safe because courts no longer accept the motivations behind crimes of passion after a child has been raped or murdered.
Children are not safe because evil motivates individuals to sue for "rights" instead of freedoms -- even if that way is abusive to children.
Children are not safe because the economy has permanently tanked under environmentalism, OSHA, Cloward-Piven and globalism, and therefore fathers have no jobs.
When fathers have no jobs, they cannot protect their children from bullies. They cannot take care of their children's mothers. They languish. They bully the mothers and children themselves, because they have no digity or purpose.
Children are not safe because there is a lawyer behind every tree, waiting to sue any legal protection once provided by the family out of existence, because family is bedrock traditional. And rights lawyers say bedrock tradition is racist, sexist, and homophobic.
Controlling what children eat is like looking at a giant tree whose leaves are withered, and then spraying water on the leaves instead of irrigating the roots.
SOME were fit——
Many were dead.
Yes Michelle wants to run the PC police and go after people who are dissenting against the administration. Typical totalitarian behavior.
Maybe it is a plot to have the kids go hungry to blame Republicans for not giving enough money to the food programs at schools. But she is actually costing schools lots of money by having kids throw it all away. Especially when they invested in changes to the menus only for it to backfire. It is her way or the highway and Michelle wants to keep on forcing it. She doesn’t care the outcome.
Very Well Said!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.