Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/19/2014 9:51:02 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Oliviaforever

Bull..

The state has to tell the Federal judge he is wrong. And the state has to issue a statement saying no marriages performed during that time will be honored!! Deal with it.


2 posted on 05/19/2014 9:57:18 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

At the very least, this judge needs to be ignored...


3 posted on 05/19/2014 9:57:31 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Silly and absurd. Judicial decisions that violate Darwinian law are not wise.


5 posted on 05/19/2014 10:02:02 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

This federal over reach has gone too far.

Now we have 3 lesbians marrying and having a child with a Mans sperm.

This is Satan’s ground, no good can come of it.


6 posted on 05/19/2014 10:04:55 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Chief among those rights, the judge noted, are the right to property, inheritance, legal protection and “the custody and care of children” — an issue at the center


This is lame. A will can provide these Rights to anyone even Heterosexuals shacking up.


7 posted on 05/19/2014 10:10:28 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

The War against religion train is leading to the gas chambers.


8 posted on 05/19/2014 10:11:48 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

bullcrap.

just don’t do it.

screw fedgov. funsa.


10 posted on 05/19/2014 10:27:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

So I am losing track of the perverts track record - does this make state #19 or was UT previously in the count of 18 states that now honor sodomy?


11 posted on 05/19/2014 10:29:54 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever; All

As mentioned in related threads, please consider the following.

Regardless of PC, pro-gay interpretations of the 14th Amendment’s equal protections clause, the states have never amended the Constituiton to expressly protect so-called gay rights. In fact, the Constitution’s silence about both gay “rights” and marriage means that the states are free to make laws which discriminate against gay agenda issues, as long as such laws don’t unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.

The reason that activist judges are getting away with promoting gay “rights” from the bench is the following imo. Sadly, parents have not been making sure that their children are being taught the Constitution, particularly 10th Amendment-protected state powers versus enumerated rights, non-enumerated rights in the case of gay issues. Neither are children being taught the difference between legislative and judicial powers. So although low-information citizens know that something is wrong when judges decide gay rights cases in favor of the gay agenda, they don’t know enough about the Constitution and basic government powers to argue their convictions.

Where activist federal judges are concerned, citizens need to do the following. Citizens need to work with their federal lawmakers to make punitive laws which require judges to promptly, clearly and publicly state specific constitutional clauses to justify their decisions. And if the Constitution is silent about a particular issue, making the issue state power issue, then judges need to indicate that also.


12 posted on 05/19/2014 10:36:54 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Now is the time for governors with backbones to stand up. Are there any?


13 posted on 05/19/2014 10:40:24 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Just what are we supposed to do about these unelected federal tyrants that continue to push perversion against the will of the people of the several states?

We cannot vote them out, and they do not give a rat’s tail about our objections to their activism.

Are we supposed to just stand around and take it while they destroy every last vestige of decency so to give the sodomite reprobates all they need to totally destroy whatever is left of marriage?

Where do we draw the line and what do we do to stop these politically corrupt and morally bankrupt black robed monsters?


14 posted on 05/19/2014 10:51:21 PM PDT by WTFOVR (I find myself exclaiming that expression quite often these days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

What could the judge do if Utah refused to follow his order and instead honored the wishes of it’s citizens?


15 posted on 05/19/2014 10:52:05 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

States need to just say no


17 posted on 05/19/2014 10:53:25 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever
Of course, your honor, we recognize all lawful marriages. Our laws state that marriage is the union of a man and a woman in matrimony. We recognize all of those marriages. As for the fictional unions, well, we have no laws to handle those unions, and they aren't marriages, so ok, thanks for your recommendation. I'm sure you'll get around to writing our legislation for us, but until you do, they hold no significance to us.
23 posted on 05/20/2014 12:17:27 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Or what? Or the judge will soil their britches? Invalid unions are not honored. THAT is the law.


25 posted on 05/20/2014 2:32:53 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

26 posted on 05/20/2014 2:34:21 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

“among those rights, the judge noted, are the right to property, inheritance, legal protection and “the custody and care of children””

This is what it is about. Control and getting stuff.


27 posted on 05/20/2014 4:50:46 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

A ‘Rat, one of Klinton’s gifts.


30 posted on 05/20/2014 6:15:27 AM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

And what if UTAH refuses to honor these “marriages”?


31 posted on 05/20/2014 6:20:07 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

“Gay marriage” is an attempted coup d’etat against God, against nature, and against We the People of the United States. I assure you that neither God nor nature will be overthrown. The only question is whether the American people will allow themselves to be overthrown by lawless judges and their supine enablers in the other two branches. The verdict is still out.

What ever happened to checks and balances anyhow?

Frankly, the country can’t be saved until we start to elect folks who understand our form of government to our legislatures and as executives, who will tell the judges to go to hell when they get out of line.


32 posted on 05/20/2014 6:44:03 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson