The state should just say NO. Why do they obey unconstitutional diktats of an imperial court instead of just saying they won’t comply?
Is there not one Governor who just declines to obey these illegal orders?
What do you call an attorney who has an IQ of less than 50?
Your Honor.
Gay couples could flood courthouses Friday morning, seeking to exercise a newly declared right to marry in Idaho.
Well, that’s the whole idea isn’t it judge?
And the march of court ordered homosexual marriage continues...........state by state........................
The next time the Supreme Court takes up the issue of homosexual marriage, they will probably issue a sweeping ruling for 50 state homosexual marriage.
It seems clear now, that the only people in America who are allowed to define marriage will be federal judges.
The federal courts hare utterly and completely politicized, and therefore corrupt.
No state should have to obey anything they say.
What’s 0bummer gonna do? Draw a line in the sand?
Would I be wrong to guess a dyke appointed by a RAT?
Black robed emperors.
Another federal judge that should be impeached.
Kootenai County Clerk Jim Brannon is currently running to keep his position to which he had previously been appointed. He’s a very devout Christian and rock-ribbed conservative. It wouldn’t surprise me if he refused to issue marriage certificates to homos. This could get interesting.
Who sponsored this appointment: Former Senator Craig????
Otter should freeze all new marriage licenses for the state, if necessary, since that would not be discriminatory.
I can’t tell you how much I despise these liberal judges who think they’re super legislators. I can tell you this. Even if I was a liberal judge who seriously believed homosexual “marriage” was justified as equal treatment under the law, I would in no way allow these marriages to proceed until the opposing side had a chance to appeal. After all, we’re talking about overthrowing state constitutional amendments passed by voting majorities, and those voters deserve to be treated with respect, too.
It’s not like homosexual “marriage” existed and was then taken away. The homosexuals never had it to start with, so what’s the real harm of having them wait a bit longer? No one is preventing them from having sex or committing to a monogamous relationship with a person of their choice.
Additionally, these judges are completely ignoring previous Supreme Court rulings and precedents. The Supreme Court has never given any indication that it thinks homosexual marriage is a constitutional right. Unless my memory is wrong, I don’t recall the Supreme Court overturning state bans on homosexual marriage when it tossed out DADT.
So it really comes down to some radical judges who spit in our faces to impose political agendas. Those judges should be impeached. They don’t respect both sides and aren’t hearing the issue fairly. They’re acting like super legislators. Again, they deserve impeachment, but I’m not holding my breath. I can write this, though. King George never had it so good as these tyrants in black robes!
“Otter said today he will file motions for an emergency hearing and a stay with the 9th Circuit Court.”
This may be the nightmare case. From Idaho, to the 9th Circuit and then on to Roberts, Kennedy, Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg and Bryer at the Supreme Court.
Every single christian church should explicitly declare that they will no longer act as agents of the state in performing civil marriages - that they will only perform religious marriage ceremonies that have no basis whatsoever for the civil union aspects of “marriage” as it is defined by the state.
No such thing as a same sex marriage.
Just don’t do it, Otter.
Judges do not get to write law.