Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

It may cost government extra tax revenue, but not the economy. It actually a positive


3 posted on 05/08/2014 11:30:18 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 4rcane

True. Something of value was created and the person responsible was rewarded for it. Half of society has come to the bizarre conclusion that person B spending person A’s money somehow benefits the economy more than person A spending their own money.


4 posted on 05/08/2014 11:49:26 PM PDT by ArcadeQuarters ("Immigration Reform" is Ballot Stuffing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 4rcane

Yes, it is a positive. It puts more capital in private hands where it gets used more efficiently.
.


5 posted on 05/08/2014 11:53:30 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 4rcane

It sounds like fair to women


15 posted on 05/09/2014 4:14:27 AM PDT by alicebetter (alicebetter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 4rcane

Excellent point. That’s a subtlety you won’t find in this kind of story.


24 posted on 05/09/2014 5:28:39 AM PDT by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 4rcane
It may cost government extra tax revenue, but not the economy. It actually a positive.

That is correct. I'd bet that the £2 billion a year number is off by a factor of 5-10.

31 posted on 05/09/2014 7:02:03 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson