Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4rcane

Yes, it is a positive. It puts more capital in private hands where it gets used more efficiently.
.


5 posted on 05/08/2014 11:53:30 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SaxxonWoods
Yes, it is a positive. It puts more capital in private hands where it gets used more efficiently.

And gives a competitive advantage to the dishonest.

8 posted on 05/09/2014 1:44:32 AM PDT by freerepublicchat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SaxxonWoods; BinaryBoy; 4rcane
"but not the economy"

It benefits the informal(underground) economy but not the formal economy.

In the US, some small business do this but many will limit it because it detracts from building equity or value in the business, which detracts from the price that the business owner can sell the business for and/or makes it harder to borrow money to expand the business.

But for a business that relies mostly on labor for profit, rather than selling, it is more likely. Its harder to build "blue sky" in a labor dominated business.

During economic downturns the informal economy always expands as the formal economy contracts, because as revenue shrinks more temporarily shift to cash transactions to avoid taxes as a way of offsetting falling revenue. Then as the economy recovers, they will shift back to reported transaction.

Some places, like Mexico, the informal economy is much larger than the formal economy.

21 posted on 05/09/2014 5:07:04 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson