Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA

The taxes on wealth were much higher when I was much younger.


There are no wealth taxes, and weren’t then. Is he talking about income taxes?

I think a 0.5% portfolio/asset/net worth tax instead of any income tax would be just fine. I wonder if the billionaire would agree?


7 posted on 05/05/2014 6:24:46 AM PDT by Freeping Since 2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freeping Since 2001
The taxes on wealth were much higher when I was much younger.

I doubt it. The published federal income tax rates were much higher, but that's not the same thing for several reasons. First, state and sales taxes were much lower. Second, there were tons of loopholes and exemptions that were commonly used. Third, you have to be aware of the differences between income taxation and taxation of accumulated wealth.

In my opinion, a wealth tax is a bad idea--it would keep getting bigger over time; it would raise the cost of capital (people would expect a real return) and reduce capital formation; and it just sucks that after you've accumulated some wealth despite being taxed along the way, the government should have the right to steadily leach (or should I use "leech"?) it away.

8 posted on 05/05/2014 6:32:46 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Freeping Since 2001

How about a 10% tax on assets over one billion dollars? Wonder if he likes that idea? Likely not, as it would adversely affect HIM.

Effing POS.


9 posted on 05/05/2014 7:01:15 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson