Posted on 04/25/2014 11:40:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Of course - if one parses the statement - there is no privately held land along the Red River being looked at... BLM already considers the land theirs!
The Bureau of Land Management needs to be reconstructed!
Or even a coherent one.
We hadn’t “had enough” at that point. Just came off of the Reagan/Bush 1 years...
But, I’m sure some leftist would say “you didn’t see people resisting when a white president was grabbing land!”
Get this _beast_ off of USA; DC lives on it’s own land, only.
Why is Texas no going after the land for the owner who had his stolen 30 years ago?
The BLM and the EPA won’t stop until they are stopped. If not now when?
Good catch!
Leni
[ I think her only claim to fame is giving a speech on getting an abortion in a trailer park, or something like that.
Libtards fell in love with her instantly. ]
We could so totoally use this against them....
Get a freeper to register as democrat then perform a “passionate speech” abotu how great one of the libtard positions is, and they libs will be tripping over themselves to nominate you to run against the tea party republican.
Then win or lose we got someone in office...
If you win, right after swearing in say that to be bipartisan you are going to read a bunch of conservative books, then after a weekend of reading you claim to be converted to conservatism, but stay as a conservative democrat, mwahahahaha
Yep, Bush failed to reverse this and other evil EO's by the slimy Clinton.
Bush didn't want to because like Clinton, he is a Statist at heart.
One of the reasons is because while the elected officials may change for the better, the bureaucracy remains intact, and those people think they are your boss.
That bureaucracy needs to be reduced and corralled. Law are supposed to be made by Congress, not unelected bureaucrats.
They tried to get him to file some sort of paper work, to let him use it or something (it wasn't clear to me exactly what in the interview), but he didn't. Apparently didn't appeal the decision either.
Meanwhile the land has basically just been there, with whoever wants doing whatever.
I have had no luck trying to find any court documents giving the judge's reasoning on that case.
I do not believe Wendy Davis’ oars are all in the water...
And if she says anything, it needs to be fact checked, verified, and a polygraph needs to be administered...
Bottom line is it would not surprise many people that Wendy Davis IS NOT a friend to her own state...Therefore, she means nothing to me or others who know better...
She deserves no consideration, nor does she have ANY credibility in or out of politics...
So that makes her the perfect democrat party candidate...
Thanks for the heads up Jim!
Looks like the path forward is for the State of Texas to start with a land survey and make sure it sticks to the Red River.
It would be most unwise to let the BLM do the survey.
This is Texas land, once lost it may be lost forever cutting Texans off from a vital water source and pristine ranching/farming land. Not to mention the upset balance of private property rights.
Texas must do everything it can to keep the BLM out of Texas.
Barry will ratchet it up. His narcissism prevents him from standing down.
That’s the gawdawfullest explanation of a gummint claim to some land I think Ive ever seen. It requires one to believe that somehow the Red River created, all by itself, some new land along its banks, either on the south or the north banks, and that the new land must somehow belong to the gummint. It’s not like there might be a few surveys that might be, oh, say a century or so old?
Being unused to saying things that make good sense, she failed when she tried!
She doesn’t want Texans taking BLM land. At least, that’s what my reading comprehension skills tell me. But, I did read it twice just to be sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.