Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired Supreme Court justice says marijuana should be legalized
FOX News ^ | April 25, 2014 | Associated Press

Posted on 04/25/2014 11:11:18 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Stevens also says that there isn't much distinction between marijuana and alcoholic beverages.

John Paul Stevens should not open his mouth if he does not know what it is he is saying. There are huge and significant differences between alcoholic beverages and marijuana, so many that they cannot be compared.

There are many varieties of alcoholic beverages with a long history of use, thousands of years. Permanent and short term effects are well known, as well as the dangers of excessive consumption.

What are known about the carcinogens, permanent brain alteration, psychotic drug effects, memory loss, and other deleterious effects of marijuana use, are being suppressed or ignored so as not to stop the juggernaut of stupidly legalizing its use.

Already in Colorado there are increases in auto accidents, deaths, hospitalizations, bad effects on children, and maybe an overall dumbing down of the population. We are not living in rationale times.

21 posted on 04/25/2014 11:48:50 AM PDT by olezip (Time obliterates the fictions of opinion and confirms the decisions of nature. ~ Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olezip

Get real, it’s one of the most studied substances on the planet. Have a drink and lighten up.


22 posted on 04/25/2014 11:53:32 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
He has to be the worst SCOTUS Appointee by a republican ever.

Nope, Earl Warren.

23 posted on 04/25/2014 12:01:17 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

You are correct; the “need” for the militarized police, or the present justification for them, would go away. But the police themselves would not, and a new justification for their existence would be created.

In fact, the “war on drugs” is in itself proof of this. While marijuana had been illegal before 1935, there had not been much effort to enforce any of the laws. In 1935, all of that changed and the “war on drugs began in earnest. Why then? Because between 1922 and 1933 armies of police had been hired to enforce Prohibition. But in 1933, that justification for their existence was eliminated. The officers needed something to do so “Reefer Madness” was filmed, and the rest is history.


24 posted on 04/25/2014 12:05:28 PM PDT by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

If drugs were decriminalized, about 98% of the militarized police force would no longer be needed.

*********

Those fedcoats are not about the “war” on drugs.


25 posted on 04/25/2014 12:10:15 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Nope, Earl Warren.

Yeah - I overlooked "Earl The Pearl".

Stevens moves to "Second Worse".


26 posted on 04/25/2014 12:20:54 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Malaysia Flight MH370 Black Box signals reported in Bermuda Triangle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

At 94 he is still making stupid statements. At least this one does haven’t the effect of law


27 posted on 04/25/2014 12:22:45 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

Stevens is apparently in some sort of competition with John McCain and Bob Dole to see who can make the highest number of inane dementia-driven comments in their remaining time on Earth.


28 posted on 04/25/2014 12:25:04 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

obviously they never read psych college texts that always say it is a bad idea. LIB texts at that.


29 posted on 04/25/2014 12:35:00 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

LOL! I never thought of it that way, but yes, they’re in a sort of Geriatric Stupidity Olympics.


30 posted on 04/25/2014 12:45:57 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

This is for people who want to get high? I understand the medical part, but for healthy people to smoke weed to “feel better” amazes me.
*****************************
Why ?? almost all mammals do it to some extent... birds too .. they seek out naturally fermented berries, psychedelic fungi and such ... I don’t smoke but if it was legal I would cook with it ,, I don’t need the tar and crap in my lungs ... alcohol even in small quantities makes it hard for me to sleep...

The war on drugs is about power and control.. lets release non-violent drug offenders so they can go out get a job and build our economy.


31 posted on 04/25/2014 1:04:41 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

And, of course, the prison would empty out so much you could probably put prisoners one to a cell so they wouldn’t beat the crap out of each other or do unmentionable things to each other after lights out.

Then you could put more violent thugs in jail, rather than giving them probation.


32 posted on 04/25/2014 1:15:24 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

You would have to be careful with the weed, however. It is a lot more potent than it used to be. One brownie in 2014 might be equal to 10 brownies back in the 1970s.


33 posted on 04/25/2014 1:17:22 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

5: No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

2: The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Hmm.. Maybe I skipped a line or two, but I'm still failing to find where marijuana is even mentioned in the first place?
34 posted on 04/25/2014 1:37:13 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


35 posted on 04/25/2014 6:53:46 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
The war on drugs is about power and control.. lets release non-violent drug offenders so they can go out get a job and build our economy
That is the most absurd statement I've ever seen on FR. TROLL?
36 posted on 04/26/2014 3:12:57 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ("There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag
I agree and so do many many conservatives out here in Wa where it is now legal.

The war on drugs is a complete waste of time and money.

37 posted on 04/26/2014 3:17:34 AM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Thank you. Statistic after statistic has shown that the war on drugs is a complete failure.

And waste of money.

38 posted on 04/26/2014 3:27:51 AM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

That is the most absurd statement I’ve ever seen on FR. TROLL?
*******************
Absurd? What’s absurd is the idea that we can ruin peoples lives for attending a party where they smoke a bit of weed. What’s absurd is that we have an armed police force and the largest prison system on the planet which is geared toward jailing people for decades over minor infractions...


39 posted on 04/26/2014 4:48:46 AM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
Absurd? What’s absurd is the idea that we can ruin peoples lives for attending a party where they smoke a bit of weed.
Absurd letting a bunch of druggies and LAWBREAKERS out so they can "improve society". They are in jail because they broke the law. If you don't like the law, then CHANGE it. But I guess that's too much to ask when you have a president and attorney general that break any law they want...those your role models? (Figures)
40 posted on 04/26/2014 6:48:17 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ("There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson