Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TurboZamboni

The various states are going about this all wrong.

While I personally believe the Supreme Court was wrong when they declared abortion a constitutional “right”, that is now the law of the land

What is needed is a new constitutional amendment clearly stating that abortions are not allowed.

There are many reasons to oppose abortion on demand (besides the obvious one of killing babies). Abortions on demand has fundamentally changed our society. I believe a case can be made that our current illegal alien problem can be linked to aborting our next generation. (Politicians are not stupid, they know that programs such as Social Security are a ponzi scheme. They only work as long as new people come into the system. Abortions on demand has cut into the potential “new members” in the scheme. Replacements had to be found. So rather than enforce our emigration laws, they (the politicians) pay lip service to the law while at the same time encouraging more into our country. An influx of people that do not share our history, our language our culture, has changed our society.


6 posted on 04/17/2014 4:56:25 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I do not doubt that our climate changes. I only doubt that anything man does has any effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CIB-173RDABN
While I personally believe the Supreme Court was wrong when they declared abortion a constitutional “right”, that is now the law of the land

Jews not being able to own guns was the law of the land in Nazi Germany.

Aryan Germans not being able to marry Jews was the law of the land in Nazi Germany.

Do I have to go on? We don't need a Constitutional Amendment; we need to rid ourselves of thieves, murderers, oppressors and tyrants.

13 posted on 04/17/2014 5:05:16 AM PDT by Gaffer (Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CIB-173RDABN
What is needed is a new constitutional amendment clearly stating that abortions are not allowed.

In what world would such a thing get two-thirds of the House, two-thirds of the Senate and 38 states' approval? It couldn't clear even one of those hurdles, much less all three.

17 posted on 04/17/2014 5:11:18 AM PDT by PaulCruz2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CIB-173RDABN
While I personally believe the Supreme Court was wrong when they declared abortion a constitutional “right”, that is now the law of the land.

Lex iniusta non est lex. (Latin: An unjust law is no law at all)

Cordially,

18 posted on 04/17/2014 5:12:02 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CIB-173RDABN
While I personally believe the Supreme Court was wrong when they declared abortion a constitutional “right”, that is now the law of the land

Read Article 3. You will find nothing to back that up.

27 posted on 04/17/2014 5:23:22 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CIB-173RDABN

We can pass those Amendments after we get the Liberty Amendments (via Mark Levin) passed.

We can also pass an Amendment defining marriage according to the Judeo-Christian definition.


29 posted on 04/17/2014 5:24:57 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson