Posted on 04/14/2014 4:29:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Warning follows threat from Harry Reid that grazing dispute 'not over'
The chief of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association says his sources inside the federal government are warning that Washington’s weekend retreat in a dispute over grazing land in Nevada was just to distract and defuse – because a raid on the family’s ranch still is being strategized.
And there probably would be violence involved, said Richard Mack, the former sheriff of Grisham County, Ariz.
“I don’t think it would be possible” to launch a raid without violence, he told WND Monday. “I don’t the Bundys would lie down and be taken.”
He cited the threat from Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., that the confrontation was far from over, despite the weekend’s retreat by armed gunmen working for federal agencies.
Reid on Monday told KRNV-TV in Reno. “It’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Thanks for your thoughtful comments and perspective.
How about they also do something about all the politicians breaking the law and selling the American Citizens down the river?
When it comes this kinda stuff, I got a message for Reid - You first buddy boyo.
I did FRiend. I’m in the heart of Obamacountry. Where do you think that is?
THEY ARE DEMOCRATS.
Not clean like Rosa???
She never got the FBI, IRS, NSA, CIA, drive-by media anal exam.
I’ll bet Rosa put her toilet paper on the roller with the sheets unrolling the wrong way.
Obamacountry. Where do you think that is?
]
Kenya
I'll take that bet, but first you have to tell me what "sheets unrolling the wrong way" is.
Reid’s a Democrat of the highest order. A self righteous, self serving, greedy Anus Orifice, and what’s with this crap ““It’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over.” when in fact he, and his Democrat cohorts are the ones REPEATEDLY violating the law of our land, the Constitution.
Last I check, Brown won the war. He prevented the “wiser more mature men” from succeeding. Not a coincidence that the Battle Hymn of the Republic is built upon John Brown’s Body.
Who knows how the election of 1860 would have turned out without Harper’s Ferry, but once a majority of voters in a majority of states, though they themselves were an overall minority, had adopted a more radical course, and another polarized group pulled their officials out of Washington, things happened.
Try again. I’ll give you a clue. It will make you ill and annoy you. They call Obama’s county crook. His city might mean smelly onion, but it’s mostly Democrats windbagging.
We appreciate any help you can provide.
However, the Federales have their Judge and their court order. They intend to enforce it at the barrel of a gun.
After the bloodshed, please continue the legal process.
Bundy made an informed decision
Is such a thing possible any more? They tell you only what they want you to know, and they can change it tomorrow if they feel like it.
They can change it tomorrow - it’s public land owned by the government. They do it all the time, but lest we forget this is business. Bundy could round up his cattle and sell to other ranchers if he did not have the graze. There is no promise for grazing rights that you are guaranteed the rights forever. My neighbors - all God fearing conservatives - who run cattle understand this. They don’t grant long term contracts, but regardless - BLM grazing rights are a contract and the government would have to honor the contract, but it’s not permanent - never is.
Cattle are not a long-term asset - they are born - they fatten up - they go to market. Even the breeding stock is not a long term asset. Smart ranchers adjust their stock numbers to match the available feed. Criminal ranchers allow their cattle onto land that does not belong to them.
The process for grazing rights is extremely well established and it’s not hard to understand. In some places they even outbid one another for the rights - it’s business! This controversy does not affect Bundy’s home or his own land - it is land he pushed cows onto that he does not own in violation of the law. The other ranchers pay - he did not.
Making him into a heroic figure mistreated by the government is a recipe for anarchy. Again, does my neighbor have the right to push his cows onto my land without my permission because he used to own it?
If we the people all took your stand ,we’d all be kneeling to king george.
or speaking German of Japanese
Watch this video and you’ll understand what law.
Steven Pratt, Bound by Oath to Support THIS Constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Hb7Or-f62jY#at=1086
Write your own history, then. Throw in with Bundy, but just for good measure what’s his legal argument for not paying the BLM fees?
If he’s correct, then why aren’t other land owners using that same legal argument to avoid fees?
Just to be double safe, why not find a dozen other real victims of government abuse. It’s just insurance for when Bundy’s exposed as a fraud and a kook or when the bloodshed starts because some hothead thinks it’s about Cliven Bundy and not about American liberty.
typical avoidance answer
how much do you get paid per post?
Opposite the way your Mom did it.
I think that the next try will be a badge kill. The Bundys will be killed “resisting” arrest. What charge they will come up with I can’t say but they will come up with something.
or send the water to solar plants, which need water, instead of crops
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.