Posted on 04/06/2014 5:43:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
You claimed I personally attacked you.
Prove it.
Quote me.
Give links.
“Prove it.”
No. You made unproven claims. Prove those.
Oh, and stop whining.
Why respond to someone that simply throws crap at the wall to see what sticks? It’s like trying to teach a pig to sing.
You claimed in post 238 that I personally attacked you.
Back up your claim or be proven a liar.
Pointing out how you lied is not whining, it is how debate works.
Quoting you is not a personal attack.
This is a conservative forum, I backed up what I said earlier with links and quotes.
You CAN do the same, right?
Boredom at work.
It’s like swatting flies.
I guess.
You did no such thing. You are a whiner.
Stop posting to me unless you have something substantive and o. Subject.
He'll continue to make accusations and never back them up.
Lol.
Prove it!
And I did provide links and quotes.
Post 237, post 177, post 161, post 156.
All quoting you.
All contradicting your claim in post 152.
You’re only here to pee on the campfire and toss insults, then act like you did something.
Oh yeah, quoting you is apparently a personal attack...but only if you don’t like the truth being shown and dislike honest discourse.
Have a pleasant evening.
I know I will.
B. Hussein Obama continues unimpeded as the arrogant Democrat leader of the Left Wing, Anti-Work Counterculture thanks to doormat Republicans such as Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, Issa, McConnell, and McCain.
Counterculture Democrats reap what they sow, and doormat Republicans provide the fertilizer.
What can possibly go wrong?
“He’ll continue to make accusations and never back them up. “
You describe your buddy, not me, ironically.
Now, now, these tantrums may have worked (and still work) on your mother, but not me. Are you done yet?
And a personal attack from the one claiming he was attacked.
Amaze us, wow us.
Show us all how you were attacked?
Can’t?
How odd.
Why is it, though, that you hate being quoted so much?
It’s a wonder your lady friend took 10 years to get to know you. I had your number in 3 posts.
Now, do you have anything to contribute to the subject of the thread, or would you like to continue playing childish games?
What childish games would those be other than watching you duck questions, lie, claim you were attacked, lie, then insult?
I’m at work and have time on my hands.
Lots of time, and patience.
You can answer “where did I personally attack you” right?
You can quote and provide links, right?
That is an interesting question for you to be posting to him.
To get back to the Rand Paul article, do you think Rand Paul was calling to make the California GOP becoming more conservative, more like Texas, or calling on them to move left, to “a more tolerant view of American politics”?
Quote “”More conservatives need to proudly stand up and protect the Bill of Rights. I am certain the influential writers at Breitbart California will stand with me and continue to introduce a more tolerant view of American politics and a view that will attract new members to our movement.””
Ok, great. I’m glad you have time. You have fabricated the “lie” accusation. Why don’t you put your ample research time detailing that one.
I’ll review your research for veracity in the morning.
Oh no!
Direct questions!
It must be a personal attack!
/ kidding.
The RINOs and their shills never cease to amaze me with their quisling behavior.
Rand is certainly working on earning his dads “raving nutter” shoes.
Fabricated?
Might I remind you of your claim of being personally attacked in post 238?
That isn’t a fabrication.
It’s right there in black and white pixels for all to read.
As are your attempts to insult.
Back up your claim with quotes and links.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.