Posted on 03/25/2014 9:23:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Romney still wrong about Russia, says Obama.
Speaking at a brief news conference in the Hague, President Obama said he's more worried about a loose nuke being detonated in Manhattan than he is about Russia:
"With respect to Mr. Romney's assertion that Russia is our number one geopolitical foe, the truth of the matter is that America has a whole lot of challenges," said the president.
"Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neigbors, not out of strength, but out weakness.
"Ukraine has been a country which Russia had enormous influence for decades, since the break-up of the Soviet Union, and we have considerable influence on our neighbors, we generally don't need to invade them in order to have a strong cooperative relationship with them. The fact that Russia felt compelled to go in militarily and laid bear these violations of internationl law indicates less influence not more.
"So my response then continues to be what I believe today, which is: Russia's actions are a problem. They don't pose the number one national security threat to the United States. I continue to be much more concerned when it comes to our security with the prospect of a nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan," said Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
? Obama's the REAL danger to America!
So, you believe Obama is on a suicide mission?
He was raised “from his mother’s knee” to hate freedom, to hate Western Civilization and most of all to hate this country.
He knows this country is the keystone in the arch of Western Civilization, that if he can destroy us the whole thing comes tumbling down.
If he dies in the process, he’ll die happy knowing that a billion Muslims will be singing his praises for a millenium as the one who destroyed The Great Satan.
If he wanted to do this, why would he risk a second election? He had 4 years to do it. Your theory is illogical.
Some things take time.
He, and his handlers, need to proceed slowly in order not to provoke a coup d’etat.
What if he had lost the last election? You did not address that. Why risk losing the opportunity?
There is absolutely zero logic to your theory.
You don’t really think the Democrat vote-fraud machine would let him lose an election, do you?
That’s a theory with absolutely zero logic.
Ah, I get it. Every hole in logic can be accounted for as long as one takes a paranoid view.
Obama is a crap president, but if he wanted to do as you say, he would not have taken the chance of a second election.
Calling me paranoid?
Really?
Is that the best you can do?
Without logic or evidence, I see no other possible options.
I am willing to listen if you have anything other to say on the topic, other than arguments that are patently illogical.
We all know Obama is a horror show. That is a given, but saying that he plans to take over for his Muslim brothers is more than a stretch. If you are going to offer up a theory like that, you could at least offer up why he didn’t do it while he had the chance.
It is not going to happen. If you disagree, perhaps we could agree on some sort of wager.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.