Posted on 03/24/2014 2:47:15 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
We’ve been told before that a tea-party revolt was brewing, only to see it fall flat, so maybe this is idle saber-rattling on a slow news day.
Riddle me this, though. If this is just a bluff, what’s the angle? What do the anti-Boehner forces gain by warning this guy through the media that he has nothing to lose by screwing the caucus every which way before the midterms? If he’s a dead man walking, what’s keeping him from bringing amnesty to the floor and letting 20 RINOs pass it with Pelosi’s help?
“My sense at the present time that the Speaker doesn’t have the support of the conference,” says South Carolina Republican Rep. Jeff Duncan about John Boehner. Another member of the House privately estimates that 40 Republican lawmakers would vote against Boehner on the floor and says “I’ve seen a running total.”
“Believe me, they’re not going to go through the national embarrassment — all of the cameras are on the floor — they’re not going to go through that. A leader will emerge before that happens,” the source adds…
Majority Leader Eric Cantor has turned up the intensity of his outreach to members in preparation for the possibility Boehner retires but is facing new questions from the right about his conservative bona fides…
“I could go through chapter and verse on multiple times when we ended up having some crappy vote on the floor and it was all Cantor’s idea,” the member who estimated 40 lawmakers would vote against Boehner says. “Almost every time we’ve violated the Hastert rule, it’s been something that Cantor was pushing. I think he’s more scary than Boehner.”
Duncan insists “there are conversations being had.” If this were a bluff, designed to goose tea partiers into turning out in even heavier numbers this fall with the prospect of turning the House redder and installing a more conservative Speaker, then the whisperers should be claiming that they don’t have the votes yet, right? That’s why they need righties to go to the polls; only by electing another dozen or so tea partiers, the theory would go, could they be assured of beating Boehner next January. Instead, they’re saying they … already have the numbers. (Forty votes would be more than enough to prevent a House majority on Boehner’s behalf, unless a few dozen centrist Republicans defeated Democrats this fall.) So there’s no extra incentive to turn out if you’re a Boehner-hater. On the contrary, if you’re a centrist Republican who thinks the House caucus needs a moderating hand on the wheel, this is an incentive to stay home or vote Democratic. And if you’re Boehner, it’s an incentive to pass agenda items this year, like immigration reform, that you fear might otherwise alienate the tea party. Why not, if you’re being pushed towards the exit anyway?
Could be this is a ghost-of-Christmas-future thing, where tea partiers warn him of what might happen if he proceeds with things like amnesty, but in that case you’d expect them to make their demands explicit. Nope. There’s nothing in Jonathan Strong’s piece about immigration specifically. Which leaves us with one obvious possibility: Maybe, despite all the rumors about Boehner considering retirement, he’s now leaning towards staying on another two years. That would make sense, given the growing odds that the GOP will retake the Senate. Boehner’s always wanted to strike a grand bargain with Obama on deficit reduction; maybe he reasons that having control of both chambers is the party’s last best chance to pressure O into a deal. And House tea partiers, realizing that he’s now inclined to stay, have decided they need to rattle the saber to make him change his mind. Retire — or be ousted in humiliating fashion. But if Boehner goes and Cantor is unacceptable, who’s next?
Eric Cantor isn't the conservative they will try to sell to the masses to make him the next speaker...
No RINO in my State will be getting my vote this time around, and they are all RINOs.
Amen to that. he’s tells it like it is with his east Texas twang.
I hope we can get a new speaker out of this cycle. Bonner is establishment and a collaborator.
the “republican leadership” is woorthless.
Couple of mamby pamby go along get along let’s all make money a-holes.
get the hell rid of mc connel and boehner, please.
There are rumors that Boehner might be replaced as speaker. This is really good news if true. If he is replaced I ask that you vote for a conservative who will fight and not play political games. Too many republicans are more concerned about their “friends on the other side of the aisle” rather than doing what we sent them to DC to do; fight for their people. Obama and the left has gotten away breaking laws, spending our children into a lifetime of debt, using the IRS to target conservatives (my husband and I were audited for the first time ever and can't help but wonder if it was because of our political and religious giving), we have not gotten the truth on Benghazi and fast and furious, plus no one has been held accountable for the deaths. I could go on and on, but the bottom line is, PLEASE vote for a fighter; someone who isn't afraid to stand up to obama, the left and the media. There are brave patriots who will do that, so please, no rinos or people who have caved under pressure.
Thank you,
Hope Boner gets the boot
what life elements specifically
I wonder if it's near Pete Sessions' new abode. After getting married to a Florida woman, he rarely spends time in his district in Texas.
no boner
no cantor
no ryan
i agree with you on all 3. Ryan is a huge disappointment.
From the author’s fingers to republican house member’s ears and vote.
PLease! Get rid of bonehead!
Louie! Louie! Louie! Sounds good to me.
NO, NO, NO, NO and NO again and again.
Cantor and Ryan are losers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.