Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Oppose Article V State Amendment Convention in FL Senate Rules Committee Vote
Florida Senate ^

Posted on 03/20/2014 3:17:52 PM PDT by Jacquerie

Today, Florida took another step toward reclaiming federal powers foolishly given away in 1913.

The Senate Rules Committee passed by 8-5, the following resolution:

Amendments to the Constitution of the United States; Applying to Congress to call a convention for the sole purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States which impose fiscal restraints on the Federal Government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government, and limit the terms of office for federal officials and members of Congress.

Every Republican voted yea, every Democrat nay.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: articlev; constitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
The FL Senate Rules Committee vote closely mirrors that of the AZ legislature, where Republicans supported, and nearly all Democrats opposed an Article V state amendment convention.

It makes perfect sense. The Left owns Rome-on-the-Potomac and can gain nothing from amending the constitution they soil every day. Patriots have nothing to lose, and everything to gain from a state amendment convention.

1 posted on 03/20/2014 3:17:52 PM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I guess the democRats don’t believe their own propaganda!


2 posted on 03/20/2014 3:21:19 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative; VerySadAmerican; Nuc 1.1; MamaTexan; Political Junkie Too; jeffc; 1010RD; ...
Rats Oppose Article V ping!
3 posted on 03/20/2014 3:21:58 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Obama has established executive branch precedents that no election can reverse. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
It makes perfect sense. The Left owns Rome-on-the-Potomac and can gain nothing from amending the constitution they soil every day. Patriots have nothing to lose, and everything to gain from a state amendment convention.

"state amendment proposal convention."

4 posted on 03/20/2014 3:34:29 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; All
... which impose fiscal restraints on the Federal Government, ...

Yes, Justice John Bingham's official clarification of Congress's limited power to lay taxes needs to be enumerated into the Constitution.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
... limit the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government, and limit the terms of office for federal officials and members of Congress.

The Founding States had made the Constitution's Section 8 of Article I to deliberately limit (cripple) Congress's powers. So what's the new amendment supposed to do besides say "See Section 8 of Article I?"

Also, although I will support a term limits amendment, if patriots stop the tsunami of constitutionally indefensible federal taxes then nobody is going to want to be a member of Congress anyway imo.

What we need is an amendment which allows states to recall bad-apple members of Congress with a provision to allow 2/3 of all state legislatures to recall bad-apple members of a given state.

The ill-conceived Progressive Movement 16th Amendment needs to be repealed too.

5 posted on 03/20/2014 3:40:15 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Left owns Rome-on-the-Potomac and can gain nothing from amending the constitution...

There IS something for leftists in state government to gain by supporting the COS effort. Term limits.

With all the 'Rat congresscritters that have life terms, and beyond... it seems to me that 'Rat state reps/sinators can be gung-ho to get their upper-classmates regular Washington DC departures to make room for the lower classmen.

6 posted on 03/20/2014 3:45:46 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; All

We need an amendment that gives 3/4 of the state legislatures the power to recall or impeach activist justices since corrupt Congress cannot be expected to do the job.


7 posted on 03/20/2014 3:47:11 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Patriots have nothing to lose, and everything to gain from a state amendment convention.

If by state amendment convention you mean a Constitutional Convention, that's not completely true. The last Constitutional Convention in 1787 was a runaway and produced our current constitution. Which is different than the constitution ratified from the Articles of Confederation. In more ways than just the Bill of Rights.

We could end up having an amendment to the US Constitution that negates the 2nd or the 4th.

Be careful what you wish for. You might get it.

8 posted on 03/20/2014 3:47:54 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; All
The Senate Rules Committee passed by 8-5, ...

I suspect that the 5 Democrats who opposed resolution don't understand that Congress has been stealing state revenues from Florida in the form of constitutionally indefensible federal taxes.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

9 posted on 03/20/2014 3:55:44 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

> “If by state amendment convention you mean a Constitutional Convention, “

That’s not at all what we mean. If we meant that, we would say that.

There has only been one Constitutional Convention, and we have a Constitution as a result. It would defy logic to call for another one, plus it would be unconstitutional, since nowhere in that sacred document is one even contemplated.

When we make a reference to “An Article V Convention of States to Propose Amendments to the Constitution,” what we’re actually talking about is an Article V Convention of States to Propose Amendments to the Constitution, as authorized by Article V. Check it out.

I hope that answers your question.


10 posted on 03/20/2014 3:57:18 PM PDT by Strawberry AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I hope lots of pro Article V convention legislators are elected in November!


11 posted on 03/20/2014 4:04:19 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Awesome!!! Congratulations to the Patriots of Georgia, the last of the original 13, from the Patriots of Arizona, the last of the contiguous 48!


12 posted on 03/20/2014 4:04:37 PM PDT by Strawberry AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
You have just enunciated one of the most pernicious myths of early American history. Let James Madison explain to you in Federalist #40 why the Constitutional Convention was not a runaway convention.
13 posted on 03/20/2014 4:11:19 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
Your idea in Post #5 was brought up in the Eighties and called the Utah Option, although I have no idea what it has to do with Utah.

The idea was that if 3/4's of the state legislatures passed a resolution of no confidence in the federal government, that government would be dissolved. New elections for the House, all Senate seats, the President and Vice President would be called 60 days after the resolution received the requisite number of votes. No incumbent would be permitted to serve in office again.

Following the election, the entire federal judiciary at all levels would be fired, and the new government would fill the federal bench with all new appointees.

I'd like to see an amendment like that.

14 posted on 03/20/2014 4:16:06 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
I seem to remember a similar push for an Article 5 convention in the 70’s. The rats ran like a bunch of scalded hogs once the numbers started to add up.
15 posted on 03/20/2014 4:17:16 PM PDT by Little Bill (EVICT Queen Jean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

The timing is interesting here, in that just after the 2014 mid-terms, I imagine that other states will start to join in, leading up to the 2016 presidential race. With a far more conservative Republican congress, and hopefully a Republican president, an Article V convention in 2017 would be far more likely.

Fair warning, security for such a convention will have to be ridiculously tight, because there will be a legion of lobbyists, terrorists, spies, scoundrels, billionaires, Wall Street speculators, insane people, you name it, trying to force their way in.

The delegates will almost have to be sequestered to protect them and their families. All communications to and from the convention will have to be air tight, possibly even carried by couriers, kept out of the view of all who would spy on it. It should be limited to messages to and from the state legislatures, which should be open to inspection after receipt.

The US military should only be used for the “outer ring” of security, with security personnel in the interior rings sworn to defend the *convention*.

Seriously, security for this is going to have to be intensely paranoid, as not just the future of the United States is at stake, but the future of the entire world.

If at all possible, an enabling law should be passed making interference with the convention in any way a major felony, and authorizing the use of deadly force in all sorts of circumstances. If there is a major assault, or detected espionage, the convention may need to sit as a jury, whose decisions cannot be excused, commuted or pardoned.


16 posted on 03/20/2014 4:27:42 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
“Pernicious myths.” Very good. There's no shortage of them schooling around Article V.
17 posted on 03/20/2014 4:30:55 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Obama has established executive branch precedents that no election can reverse. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

the dems know exactly what is going to happen to them with an article 5 convention.


18 posted on 03/20/2014 4:34:52 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

The 2nd amendment would simply be “rewritten” to mak it meangingless. Nothing to lose my ass. Liberals are just going to do nothing while conservatives make the current constitution (that is ignored by liberals) more conservative? Yeah uh huh.


19 posted on 03/20/2014 4:35:13 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
If you don't, you should write historical fiction. I don't doubt any of your predictions.

I think the primary resistance will be of the back door, out of sight variety sort of pressure on individual state legislators. The rats fear a state amendment convention, for it could be the real beginning of the end to their power.

There is no evil they will shrink from to derail return to a FreeRepublic.

20 posted on 03/20/2014 4:37:14 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Obama has established executive branch precedents that no election can reverse. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson