Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/19/2014 4:35:16 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: servo1969

When it involves regimes like Iran and Pakistan, I have no doubt that the US will treat very lightly, even help with the cover-up. Because if the truth ever came out, it would be a clear act of war and we’d have to actually do something.


2 posted on 03/19/2014 4:40:42 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Watched the segment — it wasn’t conjecture. He was confident the aircraft is in Pakistan. [Let’s see, wasn’t it the lying, dirtbag Paks who sheltered Bin Laden for 10 years?]


3 posted on 03/19/2014 4:52:44 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I am skeptical of any theory involving an Asia overland route, too many radars and people that would have spotted it.

My goofy conpsiracy theory is pilot went west over Andaman islands, turned south at Maldvies and ditched plane off Annu atoll where he is rescued and flew onward from Gan airport.

Motive: some government wanted the 20 passengers working on electronic warfare/radar defense dead.


4 posted on 03/19/2014 4:54:59 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

He stated that within 24 ~ 48 hrs there would be some sort of announcement saying such.

This has always been the most plausible explanation to me.

If the plane had exploded in mid air, satellites would have seen it. If a plane that large had crashed in the ocean a multitude of stuff that does not sink would have been spotted with all the eyes in that area.

I would be disappointed with our current administration if they were to be honest with the public.


11 posted on 03/19/2014 5:15:43 AM PDT by CodeJockey (Christian, Freeper, Tea Party Member, Bitter Clinger, Creepy White Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
Hmmmm.

Technically speaking, if there was enough fuel on board to get to ________ then the plane may have landed in _______.

The question becomes, how do you hide a 777 from public observation and from satellite view? You need a hangar, a very large hangar, and you need total control of the airfield. You also need a suitably long runway and taxiways/tarmac that is thick enough to support a 777’s weight.

If that plane landed somewhere, then a government is involved. The only governments that I can imagine going down that path are NK and Iran. Given the number of Chinese nationals onboard, I can't imagine either one doing it to get the airplane, as using the airplane later would bring all hell down on them from the West and the East.

So what gain would there be in taking the people/cargo on the plane?

12 posted on 03/19/2014 5:15:49 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Since day 1 I’ve had a hard time believing the US doesn’t know what happened to this plane.


15 posted on 03/19/2014 5:20:49 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

How does he explain the 7 hours of engine pings???


16 posted on 03/19/2014 5:26:23 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

“May” have landed in Pakistan? So in other words his sources don’t know anything for sure either.


18 posted on 03/19/2014 5:32:37 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

His theory, as well as 99.999% of ours, won’t buy a cup of coffee.


22 posted on 03/19/2014 6:16:29 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
God help me, I cannot help but imagine the worst about this administration. Convinced this administration is aware of a lot more detail than they have revealed, it begins to smell of complicit involvement.

Considering Samantha Powers expressed desire to invade Israel, this administration's clear move away from support for Israel's independence in conjunction with it's full throttled support for the Muslim Brotherhood, this administration's silence is the proverbial wink and a nod for what is potentially in store for the enemies of Islam.

23 posted on 03/19/2014 6:23:22 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I dunno. I agree with other Posters here that if it flew over a Sovereign country in Asia, it would have been seen and treated as hostile (No transponder or radio contact).

Once landed safely at an airport with the capacity for it (Meaning on its wheels with all the parts still on the plane), it is not something that is easily hidden. It would also be outta gas, needing about 5 full tanker trucks (40,000 gallons) to refill. The logistics are a pretty big challenge for any organization outside of a Government.

I just can’t overcome the obvious shortcomings of this theory.


24 posted on 03/19/2014 6:35:48 AM PDT by Mr. Quarterpanel (I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

We smashed Iraq and Iran was the benefactor -a potential threat was hobbled and they gained great influence over affairs in Iraq.

Pakistan is majority Sunni and the have nukes, this is the greatest threat to Iran’s hegemony. If Iran’s Revolutionary Guard wanted us to do to Pakistan what we did to Iraq they might lend support to a plot that implicates Pakistan.

Don’t under estimate the zealotry of Shiism, which is well at work in Syria.

Otherwise, I don’t think Iran would risk being implicated in a plot against a plane where the majority of the passengers are Chinese. No way, China is too loyal and ally to Iran.


25 posted on 03/19/2014 6:45:16 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

If true, one must wonder why terrorists need a Malaysian Airlines 777 when Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) has its own fleet. Perhaps PIA’s flight crews couldn’t be bought?


26 posted on 03/19/2014 7:31:11 AM PDT by railroader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I think they know exactly where that plane is. Mr. GG2 is speculating its sitting on Diego Garcia to be used as the next false flag here. I hate to say I can’t even argue with him about it. I put nothing past the US govt.


28 posted on 03/19/2014 7:53:23 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Heard a comment last evening on one of the cable news that Indoneasia is refusing overflights of their country. If you look at the famous Inmarsta morning detection arcs, Jakarta airport is smack under the southern arc. Why would they refuse?

As I understand, the aircraft doesn’t have to be flying to make the “handshake”, only electronically operational (i.e., powered on).

If true, this would be sitting right under the noses of the Malaysians. Jakarta is only a 2 hour flight from Kuala Lampur and has scheduled Malaysian Air flights.


33 posted on 03/19/2014 9:58:05 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson