[blueplum]

two page article at link

[blueplum]

for your list

[tflabo]

Yes but there’s no magnificent, intelligent Creator dontchyaknow. /sc

[varmintman]

Big Bang is a bunch of BS just like evolution and should have been rejected on basic philosophical principles on day one, i.e. having all the mass of the universe collapsed to a point would be the mother of all black holes; nothing would ever "bang" its way out of that.

Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid......

That's before you even get to Halton Arp and the debunking of the "expanding universe" of course.

[Hot Tabasco]

I’ve always wondered how our solar system ended up with one sun endowed with limitless hydrogen (and other stuff) energy, being orbited by eight planets, each made up of different stuff...with earth being the only one that is people, plant and animal friendly.

[SampleMan]

The wonderful thing about the golden era of science ~1700-1970, was that it dealt with the application of provable principles. People had enormous respect for science, because the truth of it was readily apparent. Areas of conjecture existed, but they were not the pinnacle of academia.

Today it seems that most academic science is conjecture, and often one is hard pressed to produce even one tangible difference that a solid answer to that conjecture would make. It is like trying to determine what difference it could possibly make in our lives to know whether there was a second iceberg that no one ever saw, when the Titanic sank.

Many of these conjectures are based on a string of assumptions, that must be collectively accepted as fact, in order for “real progress” on the next conjecture to be made. That type of group think is just as likely to stymie true discovery, as it is to promote it.

[tet68]

But, were they negative or positive cause...

Enough with the negative waves man!