Skip to comments.Stanford Traditional Marriage Event Deemed ‘Hate Speech,’ Denied Funding
Posted on 03/15/2014 12:22:39 PM PDT by QT3.14
An upcoming conference organized by Stanford Universitys Anscombe Society called Communicating Values: Marriage, Family & the Media has been dubbed hate speech by the colleges graduate-level student government, which refused to allow any of its student fee-funded budget to support the event.
The Anscombe Society is a conservative student group centered around traditional marriage and family values; it also encourages chastity, and tackles subjects such as sexual integrity and pornography.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecollegefix.com ...
Like a modern day Red Guard. They’ll be burning books and forming mobs in no time. Ever notice when there are college students, the cruddy little student governments never get hit.
Not hate-Speech according to God’s word.
Academe has become the font of totalitarianism. Shudder in fear for the next step in this government-financed insanity.
Conservative students need to get involved in every level of student govt to counter ridiculous leftwing intolerance.
Also this group should sue for slander and discrimination.
If “conservatives” sweep the 2014 an 2016 elections we could have a renaissance. We could do away with the insanity of zero tolerance that pervades schools and makes a pop tart the same as a loaded weapon. Perhaps we can do away with the other insanities, abortion on demand, forced public school indoctrination...the list is huge.
On the other hand, if we lose, or don’t win big enough or elect faux conservatives...well, life will resemble one of those paranoid science fiction movies where somebody watches you all the time and punishes the slightest transgression.
When there are no absolutes to govern society, society becomes that absolute. We are there; welcome to the brave new world.
Genesis, chapter 1
27God created mankind in his image;
in the image of God he created them;
male and female* he created them.
28God blessed them and God said to them: Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.* Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and all the living things that crawl on the earth.
Genesis, chapter 2
20The man gave names to all the tame animals, all the birds of the air, and all the wild animals; but none proved to be a helper suited to the man.
21So the LORD God cast a deep sleep on the man, and while he was asleep, he took out one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh.l
22The LORD God then built the rib that he had taken from the man into a woman. When he brought her to the man,
23the man said:
“This one, at last, is bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
This one shall be called ‘woman,’
25The man and his wife were both naked, yet they felt no shame.
Let alone — Christ worked his first miracle at a wedding.
Would love to see the terms “hate speech”, “hate crime”, “homophobia”, “racist”, “bigot”, and “climate change” deleted from the language.
To be fair, I suspect most conservative students are going to be busy studying rather playing 'politics' with the student council.
I suspect that the bigger problem is that the K-12 Union/Government indoctrination centers are set up to produce brainwashed tools of the marxist State by the time they enter into College.
Incredible that the love between a man and a woman in God’s plan should be called “hate speech.”
They’ll call anything supporting normal male-female relations “heteronormative” and say how hateful and bigoted it is to support “heteronormative” values.
Making any distinction in the gender of the parties is henceforth going to be treated - everywhere, government, business and academia, in effect everywhere outside of churches and private homes - exactly like using the ‘N-word’, advocating child rape or suggesting the overthrow of the government- the end of any career outside of pastor of a conservative church.
At least that is how I see things inexorably becoming, regardless of what anyone on ‘the right’ thinks.
Any one have an email address to the school’s “graduate-level student government”?????????
Is this what we can call the brave new world?
same university which advised accepted applicants awhile back that “all the financial aid funds for the year are committed to the minority admissions program,” ostensibly by faculty vote.... so that admitted “white” or “caucasian” students could not attend (if they needed help paying the $60,000+/- a year costs)
I don’t know current situation, they may have dropped this policy. Also, they advertised a couple years ago that they could give a lot (even all) of the costs away to “lower income students” -— without mentioning any racist restrictions. BUT it does appear from this article that this college is afflicted with a very sicko mental illness, nonetheless....if not racism today, its anti-Christian, anti-Jewish (non-) “values” ..
How sad. How very very very sad.
As of today The Cardinal's baseball is at 7-8.
hypocrits liars really want is to silence opposition to their agenda.
When do they start burning books?
HomoNazis have tremendous power at most colleges and universities.
If you aren’t approving and endorsing perversion, it’s hate speech.
All this really is is attemping to criminalize and make illegal other belief systems than those liberals agree with.
Plain and simple. Since when are they arbiters of right and wrong? Seems their tolerance falls a little short. The whole “we are not tolerant of the intolerant” seems rather subjective as they decide what “intolerant” is. It’s also monumentally hypocritical.
But they are attempting to codify it as illegal or criminal behavior using the wording of Hate Speech.
These are the same liberals who in the 60s demanded free speech for their views on campuses largely conservative. They demanded it as their constitutional rights. They said unpopular or not they had a right to say it. And that they were being oppressed by the university leaders and censored and all that crap, and now that THEY are the leaders with the power they do the exact same thing.
Ultimate Hypocrisy, they have become what they hated.
“Would love to see the terms hate speech, hate crime, homophobia, racist, bigot, and climate change deleted from the language.”
Can I add “social justice” to your list?
And “inequality”. I am sure there are more. I would also include “people of color”. Not even sure what that means.
To the common man this is referred to as the "Dim-Bulb Disease."
” I would also include people of color. Not even sure what that means”
I know,it’s ridiculous. I once had a “discussion” about that term with a lib friend and I asked her if she would get “pencils of color” for her class (she teaches),and how about “paper of color”?
She had no reply.
Call the ACLJ, sue the school. It’s the only language they understand.
More like Biblical prophesy coming true in our times. Jesus told us that we would be persecuted because of Him and that is surely spreading like wildfire. He also told us that good would be called evil and evil called good.
The question is, since it's all been ordained to happen prior to His glorious return, what are we to do about it? Do we do what the Bible infers cannot/will not be done (return the world to morality) or do we tend to our own spiritual selves and try to carry the Word to those who would hear it while watching the world degenerate into the cesspool that it is ordained to become?
Exactly my thoughts.
Don't look to Hitler or Stalin to discover what Obama is building: look to Mao.
Unfortunately, "God's Word" has been restricted to a literary "Maginot Line" with the ascendency of "Bible-Only" Christianity.
Is it any wonder Christianity becomes less relevant by the day throughout the world?
“Orwellian blather from another Ivy-Covered North Korea.”
Well put; these institutions in no way represent the larger culture of this country, and while the demographics don’t favor traditional WASP ideology the replacements (Hispanic and Asian - including Muslims) are hardly tolerant of sexual deviants.
First of all, I say "black". I say "black" because most black people prefer "black". I don't say "people of color". People of color sounds like something you see when you are on mushrooms. Besides, the use of people of color is dishonest. It means precisely the same thing as colored people. If youre not willing to say "colored people" you shouldn't be saying "people of color". Besides, the whole idea of color is bullshit anyway. What should we call white people? "People of no color"? Isn't pink a color? In fact, white people arent really white at all, they're different shades of pink, olive and beige. In other words, they're colored. And black people are rarely black. I see mostly different shades of brown and tan. In fact, some light-skinned black people are lighter than the darkest white people. Look how dark the people in India are. They're dark brown but they're still considered white people. What's going on here? May I see the color chart? "People of color is an awkward, bullshit , liberal-guilt phrase that obscures meaning rather than enhancing it. Shall we call fat people, "people of size"? By the way, I think the whole reason we are encouraged in this country to think of ourselves as black and white (instead of pink and brown, which is what we are) is that black and white are complete opposites that cannot be reconciled. Black and white can never come together. Pink and brown, on the other hand, might just stand a chance of being blended, might just come together. Can't have that! Doesn't fit the plan.
I also don't say "African-American". I find it completely confusing. Which part of Africa are we talking about? What about Egypt? Egypt is in Africa. Egyptians arent black. They're like the people in India, they're the dark brown white people. But they're Africans. So why wouldn't an Egyptian who becomes a US citizen be an African-American? The same thing goes for the Republic of South Africa. Suppose a white racist from South Africa becomes an American citizen? Well, first of all, he'd find plenty of company, but couldn't he also be called an African American? It seems to me that a racist white South-African guy could come here and call himself African-American just to piss off black people. And, by the way, what about a black person born in South Africa who moves here and becomes a citizen? What is he? Is he a African-South-African-American? Or a South-African-African-American? All right. Back to the hemisphere. How about a black women who is a citizen of Jamaica? According to P.C. doctrine, she's African-Jamaican, right? But if she becomes a US citizen, she's a Jamaican-American. And yet if one of these language crusaders saw her on the street, he'd think she was African-American. Unless he knew her personally in which case he'd have to decide between African-Jamaican-American and Jamaican-African-American. Ya know? It's just so much liberal bullshit. Labels divide people. We need Fewer labels, not more.
You must be, uh, ‘Asian’.
Funny story - when my daughter was three she was in day care. One afternoon when I picked her up she was telling me about one of her teachers. Not sure which one she was talking about, I asked if she was white. She gave me a strange look and said “she’s peach”. Then she told me about another one and I asked if she was black. She looked at me like I was just stupid and said “she’s brown”. LOL I guess she thought I didn’t know my colors.
Yes, that is exactly what we do. Thanks for the good words. You have inspired me to double down on my efforts in my own spiritual life. The world always was a cesspool, it is just getting worse. I still believe, however, we should also fulfill our civic duty, and help to try and restore some sanity in it, even though we know the eventual outcome.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
That is FANTASTIC !!!!
A real keeper for me.
George Carlin bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.