Skip to comments.
Lower Capacity for Magazines Approved by New Jersey Assembly Panel
The Star Ledger ^
| 3/13/14
| Matt Friedman
Posted on 03/13/2014 11:42:15 PM PDT by Renegade
TRENTON Despite the protests of dozens of New Jersey gun-rights supporters including a 9-year-old girl a state Assembly panel today approved a bill that would reduce the number of bullets an ammunition magazine could hold from 15 to 10.
(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: banglist; chrischristie; gopestablishment; magazinesguncontrol; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
This would ban every popular tube loading .22 rifle made as well as many handguns. There doesn't seem to even be a grandfather clause that EVEN Connecticut had in their gun grab bill. OK Christie!( Rino) What you gonna do ?
1
posted on
03/13/2014 11:42:16 PM PDT
by
Renegade
To: Renegade
Reduce legislative capacity. Restrict them to passing one bill per year.
2
posted on
03/13/2014 11:58:45 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
To: Renegade
Until Americans are willing to fight each and every election as if it could be their last, you’re going to get legislated into tyranny.
3
posted on
03/14/2014 12:01:50 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: Renegade
Will not comply. Go to hell.
4
posted on
03/14/2014 12:11:24 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
(Are you naive enough to think VOTING will fix this entrenched system?)
To: TigersEye
It would be more effective to restrict their breathing capacity. Some stout hemp rope is good for this. Works on even the fattest politician.
5
posted on
03/14/2014 12:18:01 AM PDT
by
metalurgist
( Want your country back? It'll take guns and rope. Marxists won't give up peaceably.)
To: Renegade
well, that should make everyone much safer. I’ll bet the New Jersey crime rate will plummet now thanks to this bold move. /sarc
6
posted on
03/14/2014 12:20:00 AM PDT
by
RC one
(Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
To: Renegade
I’m sure being able to shoot 10 home intruders instead of 15 will make us all safer citizens.
7
posted on
03/14/2014 1:06:31 AM PDT
by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Renegade
Where is the Great Pumpkin DemocRat fat boi Krispy Kreme? Worthless gun grabber.
8
posted on
03/14/2014 2:23:21 AM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: Telepathic Intruder
Im sure being able to shoot 10 home intruders instead of 15 will make us all safer citizens. That 11th bullet is the evil one that only kills innocent people. Where is the documentation FROM HISTORICAL FACTS that support such a move. This is the problem with people legislating from emotion (an illusion) vice science, facts, math.
9
posted on
03/14/2014 2:40:55 AM PDT
by
USCG SimTech
(Honored to serve since '71)
To: metalurgist
"It would be more effective to restrict their breathing capacity. Some stout hemp rope is good for this. Works on even the fattest politician."
Or they could end up like Saddam Hussein, which, although a little tough on delicate sensibilities, worked just as well.
10
posted on
03/14/2014 2:45:04 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: Renegade
What would Gov. Christie do about it?
11
posted on
03/14/2014 3:31:44 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
To: Jonty30
“.....youre going to get legislated into tyranny.”.......
Too late, we already are!
12
posted on
03/14/2014 3:38:28 AM PDT
by
DaveA37
To: Jonty30
Until Americans are willing to fight each and every election as if it could be their last, youre going to get legislated into tyranny. The 2014 election could be our last, as could the 2016. We need to fight as if we understood that. This proposed infringement on our right to keep and bear arms, which implicitly includes the right to have ammo in those arms, is unacceptable, unconstitutional, and dangerous.
13
posted on
03/14/2014 4:42:12 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Renegade
Silly Freepers, of course I'll sign it...
Heck, everytime I see this guy's mug I half expect to see him holding a chain with princess leia on it.
14
posted on
03/14/2014 4:54:30 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Caipirabob
"Heck, everytime I see this guy's mug I half expect to see him holding a chain with princess leia on it."
LOL - that one's a keeper. Pardon me if I shamelessly steal that line to use whenever the occasion arises.
To: Renegade
Headline should read:
Lowered Capacity Describes New Jersey Assembly Panel
16
posted on
03/14/2014 5:59:50 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Renegade
Interesting way to headline it. They aren’t banning high capacity magazines. They are making them smaller.
To: TigersEye
Now that is downright smart!! And limit the page count as well.
18
posted on
03/14/2014 7:53:38 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
19
posted on
03/14/2014 10:06:37 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: SgtHooper
Good catch! That would be a major loophole.
20
posted on
03/14/2014 11:41:19 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson