Posted on 03/13/2014 1:38:13 PM PDT by Errant
Largely unreported sections of an executive order signed last week by President Obama grant the U.S. government the right to seize property of American citizens determined to be undermining, even indirectly, the democratic processes or threatening the peace in Ukraine.
The executive order does not define which actions constitute a threat to Ukrainian democracy or peace.
It cites the National Emergencies Act, which subjects to revocation the constitutional right to habeas corpus, the requirement to bring an arrested individual before a judge or court.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I’d like to call Obama a worthless POS, but I might get arrested...
...
...
Oh well, what the heck. Barack Obama is [more than ever] a worthless POS...
...yeah... for disturbing the peace in the Ukraine. /S
Hope Obama is out of office before WW III is started.
We’re too busy “protecting freedom” around the world to do it here.
Can we arrest ObiWannaBeDictator for undermining US democracy?
I had a crazy dream over 10 years ago that W was going to be the last ‘real’ president America would ever have. I’m starting to think now that maybe it wasn’t such a crazy dream after all...
Is not The Great Obama, himself, perhaps threatening the peace and democracy in the Ukraine through his silly foreign policy?
Why am I 100% SURE this does not apply to US Citizens in the employ of Soros-funded NGO’s???
Can this order be found at a source other than WND?
Executive Order -- Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine
Definitely true. Good post.
(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date of this order.
Yep, they're exempt...
could this mean any one not necessarily involved with disturbing peace in the Ukraine?
"It cites the National Emergencies Act, which subjects to revocation the constitutional right to habeas corpus, the requirement to bring an arrested individual before a judge or court."
And since it includes the word: "directly or indirectly", it pretty much can mean whatever they say it means.
Exactly. Try Maidan stuff in Versailles on the Potomac and see what happens. Just an observation, not a recommendation.
‘Three, Congress?’
WWIII starts when Hildebeast is inaugurated.
Isn’t silencing political speech unconstitutional? If you speak out for christian Russia over islamic Nato is it a hate crime?
Possibly the last election that will ever be held in this country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.