Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Farmers Fear Proposed Water Rules Will Require Costly Permits
New York Times ^ | MARCH 12, 2014 | Ron Nixon

Posted on 03/12/2014 11:24:13 AM PDT by reaganaut1

...

The Environmental Protection Agency is set to issue regulations that farmers like Mr. Lemeke say may require them to get permits for work for which they have long been exempt. The E.P.A. says the new rules are needed to clarify which bodies of water it must oversee under the federal Clean Water Act, an issue of jurisdiction that the agency says has been muddled by recent court rulings. Opponents say the rules are a power grab that could stifle economic growth and intrude on property owners’ rights.

There is no timetable for when the rules will be released. But if the agency expands its jurisdiction over streams like the one on Mr. Lemeke’s farm, he and other farmers say, the move could prove costly by requiring farmers to pay fees for environmental assessments and to get permits just to till the soil near gullies, ditches or dry streambeds where water only flows when it rains. A permit is required for any activity, like farming or construction, that creates a discharge into a body of water covered under the Clean Water Act or effects the health of it, like filling in a wetland or blocking a stream.

The proposed regulations have also raised concerns among industries beyond agriculture, and objections have been filed by the National Mining Association, the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, the International Council of Shopping Centers, the American Forest and Paper Association and the National Association of Realtors.

To coordinate the opposition efforts, those groups joined forces nearly three years ago with several agriculture trade organizations, like the American Farm Bureau Federation, to create the Waters Advocacy Coalition to lobby against increased environmental regulation.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: agenda21; epa; esa; farming; un21
Is there a sector of the economy that Rats are not trying to stifle?
1 posted on 03/12/2014 11:24:13 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Of course, it will. The government taxes requires permit$ for everything.


2 posted on 03/12/2014 11:26:18 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

One permit for 3 kidneys and 2 children to be sold as slaves,
unless the (soon to be ex-) farmer is a Moslem,
or narcoterrorist, or DNC Captain, of course.


3 posted on 03/12/2014 11:28:27 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Control access to healthcare...

Control access to food...

Control access to energy...

Hmmm...I think Mao did something similar before his reign of terror...


4 posted on 03/12/2014 11:29:26 AM PDT by EBH (And the head wound was healed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Cali-domor.....

Pretty much soon comming soon to a EPA controled FEMA region near you....


5 posted on 03/12/2014 11:29:46 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Just wait until they require permits to mow your lawn, scrape off dog doo, or remove the permanent campaign sign for his royal Highness King Barry The First and the Royal Consort, Michelle the Magnificent from your lawn.


6 posted on 03/12/2014 11:37:22 AM PDT by pikachu (After Monday and Tuesday, even the calender goes W T F !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

In Maryland, sometimes you need a permit to chop down a tree on your own property. It is so ridiculous.


7 posted on 03/12/2014 11:53:05 AM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The key phrase is in the first paragraph: "muddled by recent court rulings"

Originally, and since the 1970s, they were regulated as "navigable waters" but the court ruling muddled the water by saying all of those waters weren't navigable waters.

So they have been trying to re-implement the regs.

The waters will be regulated by some govt entity, but it might be a state or county govt, rather than the feds.

8 posted on 03/12/2014 11:57:10 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson