Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/11/2014 12:33:45 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Kaslin
Big Labor’s Top Ten Special Privileges

Labor union officials enjoy many extraordinary powers and immunities that were created by legislatures and the courts. Union officials claim to rely on the support of rank-and-file workers. Yet, they clamor in the political arena to secure and expand their government-granted powers, including the powers to shake down workers for financial support and even to wage campaigns of violent retaliation against non-union employees.

The following list of special privileges reveals the extent to which union bosses have rigged our nation’s labor laws in their favor.

Privilege #1: Exemption from prosecution for union violence.

The most egregious example of organized labor’s special privileges and immunities is the 1973 United States v. Enmons decision. In it, the United States Supreme Court held that union violence is exempted from the Hobbs Act, which makes it a federal crime to obstruct interstate commerce by robbery or extortion. As a result, thousands of incidents of violent assaults (directed mostly against workers) by union militants have gone unpunished. Meanwhile, many states also restrict the authority of law enforcement to enforce laws during strikes.

Privilege #2: Exemption from anti-monopoly laws.

The Clayton Act of 1914 exempts unions from anti-monopoly laws, enabling union officials to forcibly drive out independent or alternative employee bargaining groups.

Privilege #3: Power to force employees to accept unwanted union representation.

Monopoly bargaining, or “exclusive representation,” which is embedded in most of the country’s labor relations statutes, enables union officials to act as the exclusive bargaining agents of all employees at a unionized workplace, thereby depriving employees of the right to make their own employment contracts. For example, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935, the Federal Labor Relations Act (FLRA) of 1978, and the Railway Labor Act (RLA) of 1926 prohibit employees from negotiating their own contracts with their employers or choosing their own workplace representatives.

Privilege #4: Power to collect forced union dues.

Unlike other private organizations, unions can compel individuals to support them financially. In 26 states under the NLRA (those that have not passed Right to Work laws), all states under the RLA, on “exclusive federal enclaves,” and in many states under public sector labor relations acts, employees may be forced to pay union dues as a condition of employment, even if they reject union affiliation.

Privilege #5: Unlimited, undisclosed electioneering.

The Federal Election Campaign Act exempts unions from its limits on campaign contributions and expenditures, as well as some of its reporting requirements. Union bigwigs can spend unlimited amounts on communications to members and their families in support of, or opposition to, candidates for federal office, and they need not report these expenditures if they successfully claim that union publications are primarily devoted to other subjects. For years, the politically active National Education Association (NEA) teacher union has gotten away with claiming zero political expenditures on its IRS tax forms!

Privilege #6: Ability to strong-arm employers into negotiations.

Unlike all other parties in the economic marketplace, union officials can compel employers to bargain with them. The NLRA, FLRA, and RLA make it illegal for employers to resist a union’s collective bargaining efforts and difficult for them to counter aggressive and deceptive campaigns waged by union organizers.

Privilege #7: Right to trespass on an employer’s private property.

The Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 (and state anti-injunction acts) give union activists immunity from injunctions against trespass on an employer’s property.

Privilege #8: Ability of strikers to keep jobs despite refusing to work.

Unlike other employees, unionized employees in the private sector have the right to strike; that is, to refuse to work while keeping their job. In some cases, it is illegal for employers to hire replacement workers, even to avert bankruptcy. Meanwhile, union officials demonize replacement workers as “scabs” to set them up for retaliation.

Privilege #9: Union-only cartels on construction projects.

Under so-called project labor agreements, governments (local, state, or federal) award contracts for construction on major projects such as highways, airports, and stadiums exclusively to unionized firms. Such practices effectively lock-out qualified contractors and employees who refuse to submit to exclusive union bargaining, forced union dues, and wasteful union work rules. So far, just three states have outlawed these discriminatory and costly union-only pacts.

Privilege #10: Government funding of forced unionism.

On top of all of the special powers and immunities granted to organized labor, politicians even pour taxpayer money straight into union coffers. Union groups receive upwards of $160 million annually in direct federal grants. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. In 2001, the federal Department of Labor doled out $148 million for “international labor programs” overwhelmingly controlled by an AFL-CIO front group. Federal bureaucrats spend approximately $2.6 billion per year on “job training programs” that, under the Workforce Investment Act, must be administered by boards filled with union officials. Union bosses also benefit from a plethora of state and local government giveaways.

2 posted on 03/11/2014 12:36:34 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Barack Hussein Obama entertains a thought that he does not verbalize, is it still a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The workers at VW-Chattanooga did unite... and told the UAW to go pound sand.


3 posted on 03/11/2014 12:39:04 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Union is following standard protocol, happens all the time.


4 posted on 03/11/2014 12:39:08 PM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

FU UAW.


5 posted on 03/11/2014 12:39:35 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Let the American people have a do-over with Obama/Biden and the union can have their do-over.


6 posted on 03/11/2014 12:39:47 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; All

“Unions Request a “Do-Over” in Failed Chattanooga Union Vote”

And this time...this time with more INTIMIDATION!!!


7 posted on 03/11/2014 12:47:00 PM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Standard leftist position - keep voting until you get the result you want. Then everything’s settled and no more votes are needed.


8 posted on 03/11/2014 12:49:08 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Agreed . . . IF we can have a “do-over” of the Congressional Obamacare vote. . . .


9 posted on 03/11/2014 12:51:05 PM PDT by RatRipper (The political left are utterly evil and corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“DO OVER” ?

Really?

They just want another chance to do a better FIX on the vote count!!


10 posted on 03/11/2014 12:56:13 PM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Keep voting, comrades, until we win!”


12 posted on 03/11/2014 1:02:32 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Another recall vote. How’d that work out for ya lately?


13 posted on 03/11/2014 1:03:08 PM PDT by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Keep voting till they win, then it’s settled law


14 posted on 03/11/2014 1:05:18 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Have they ever agreed to a do-over after winning?


15 posted on 03/11/2014 1:09:09 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A bunch of sniveling self serving RATS. WAH!


16 posted on 03/11/2014 1:22:11 PM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“And we’ll KEEP re-voting until you vote the way we WANT you to!”


17 posted on 03/11/2014 1:22:52 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Given the way the Tennessee legislature threatened VW and how Corker stuck his nose in I wouldn’t be surprised if they get a second vote. But what will the UAW do if they get even fewer votes the second time around? What will that do to them?


20 posted on 03/11/2014 1:26:21 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

And you can bet that Obama’s thugs will be all behind this effort, seen and unseen.


21 posted on 03/11/2014 1:29:43 PM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Well, if “do overs” are allowed now, how about a “do over” on the last presidential election?


22 posted on 03/11/2014 1:47:10 PM PDT by Qiviut (It's hard to be a donk if you're sane & it's hard to be a pubbie if you have any integrity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

United Auto Workers union cries ‘Mommy’ to Labor Relations Board for a re-vote at Tennessee VW

No one likes a sore loser, but the United Auto Workers doesn’t seem to care.

When two small groups of workers fought the union’s intervention, the United Auto Workers and the Volkswagen Group of America immediately took offense. In a prepared statement, Volkswagen officials said the National Right to Work Foundation and Southern Momentum were unwarranted in their attempts to counter the United Auto Workers’ appeal.

The union argued that the two groups lacked jurisdiction to intercede, since neither was a labor organization or a party to the election.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/03/11/united-auto-workers-union-cries-mommy-to-labor-relations-board-for-a-re-vote-at-tennessee-vw-105658


24 posted on 03/11/2014 2:09:03 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Since VW wanted the Union, then the Union’s stance is there should have been no campaigning against the referendum by anybody, not even workers who opposed the Union. That seems to be the rationale, and Obastard’s NLRB will probably find for the Union and call another election.


25 posted on 03/11/2014 2:14:51 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson