Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/17/2014 10:47:43 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

It’s not in the Constitution - correct. There is also nothing in the Constitution which grants license to judges or anyone else to disregard the concept of language, yet these judges have done so.


2 posted on 02/17/2014 10:51:09 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It will never get to a popular vote, because the lefties know how it would go.


3 posted on 02/17/2014 10:58:48 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Pope Calvin the 1st, defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Last night in Seattle went to Spamalot - the Monty Python musical based on The Quest for the Holy Grail.

In this version Lancelot turns out to be gay and marries a “princess” held captive by ...err...its...father who of course wants him/her to marry a girl. Towards the end of the show Lancelot, having just married this person, says “and just think in a thousand years this will be legal in Washington State”. The audience cheered loudly.

It was a great show, very funny, but I have to think that this gay marriage thing is here and not going away. And then this a.m. that guy broadcasting the Olympics...they’ve moved into the mainstream.


4 posted on 02/17/2014 10:59:07 AM PST by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; All
My position on same sex marriage is that it should be decided by voters and state legislatures.

I suspect that this author is not necessarily aware of 10th Amendment-protected state powers to decide such things, and is naïvely reflecting on such powers.

8 posted on 02/17/2014 11:19:32 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

No need for a vote. It’s been decided already.


10 posted on 02/17/2014 11:21:52 AM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The counter-argument to the “marriage isn’t in the Constitution” argument is almost always, “sure, marriage isn’t there - but Equal Protection is.”

Whether or not we accept this line of argument (I think it’s pure B.S., and clearly not in keeping with the intent of the 14th Amendment’s authors), this is the argument we need to somehow counter.


12 posted on 02/17/2014 11:24:59 AM PST by MarkRegal05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Americans, from their various states, already have decided this issue!

Even Oregon voted over 70% against gay marriage!

15 posted on 02/17/2014 12:26:26 PM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Liberal elites don’t trust ‘the people’ any more than any ‘thugocracy’ trust the people.

Elites want fellow elites to make the calls...

Our beautiful country is on the way to becoming a creepy banana republic.


17 posted on 02/17/2014 2:19:25 PM PST by GOPJ ( America's drifting into totalitarianism because the left's exploitation of social failures.Greenfi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Honestly I dont see how 51% of the voters can decide the laws of nature don’t apply. Two people of the same Sex can’t make a child, and therefore cannot be said to be married in responsibility for that child.

You might as well ask people to vote on the laws of gravity it really don’t matter what they say the apple still falls from the tree just as the two men are still sterile sodomites not husband & wife.


18 posted on 02/17/2014 2:25:19 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson