It’s a good thing to question authority, to remain detached from the leftist media programming, to maintain a healthy amount of skepticism, to act as a member of a jury who refuses to be tampered with.
William Clinton and all of his party, all of his NY media and Beltway pundits tried their best to have us believe one thing against the truth, so it does happen that big lies are made and supported politically.
I know 911 happened, I had a friend inside one of the buildings that came down; I’ve stood at ground zero. It is true that many families of victims of 911 filed lawsuits:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/9-11-families-shot-suing-saudi-arabia-article-1.1553620
What Mr. Halbig is pointing out is ‘unusual’ and bears looking at with an objective eye. It doesn’t mean that we as ‘members of the jury’ have to believe the murder did not occur but only that we should hear the facts. We need not decide anything.
One fact is clear, the left tried their damnedest to disarm Americans in the aftermath of Sandy Hook. To my surprise and comfort Americans held them back and I witnessed people here in liberal Seattle saying they know that gun registration leads to gun confiscation which leads to tyranny just as it has under totalitarian regimes of the past. This was to me quite surprising.
In my first impression Mr. Halbig’s background seems credible and I find it hard to believe he would jump to a conclusion that the murders did not happen. If I were to contact him I would expect him to say the murders did happen but there are several ‘unusual’ things about the case that suggest a closer look is warranted as to facts.
Then I would look at the news source “American Free Press”. Are they leftist liars, provocateurs? Often the evil geniuses of the left try to change the national focus by creating a conspiracy story that makes conservatives look kooky and dangerous. I am not going to investigate the American Free Press because I don’t care at this point.
But you should understand that I have been here on FR a long time and have seen time and time again how ‘kooky’ thoughts and ideas have a way of eventually becoming credible and vindicated; not always but often enough to encourage a healthy skepticism.
Why don't you do that and get back to us --
And while you are at it send this credible person a map to Newtown because he admitted on the tape that he has never been there.
That’s the goal, the “why”.
Sirius Lee was getting to the “how”.
Next step is the “who”.
If there are handlers, controllers, they will design the operation so that any operatives near the operation will quickly and quietly fade into the scenery, leaving the people or person who they set in motion to be the one with dirty hands, whether they actually did the thing completely by themselves or with help, standing there (or laying there) for local LE, FBI, etc., to find, caught red handed.
There has been a pattern of nutcases shooting up places in the past few years.
And the reporting by new world order controlled news media simply pours on the agitprop thick as ever in a coordinated fashion, gleefully working their propaganda task.
“One fact is clear, the left tried their damnedest to disarm Americans in the aftermath of Sandy Hook.”
And that was different from any other shooting?..or pet victim?
Nope...standard operating procedure.
And the sad reality for the sandy hook truthers is that Adam Lanza ended up being a poster child for liberalism....why go to all the trouble to set this up then make the patsy a libtard instead of some right winger?
“it’s a false flag operation to take your guns”...
Yeah BS...
Same BS with the Boston bombing truthers.....if it was faked to set up gun owners....why blame it on two chechnian muslims??
And if you can possibly get a truther to slither into a corner long enough tod admit who think “did it”....You are going to get an answers like “jews” “ Mossad” “Zionists” “globalist bankers”...or the illuminati....