Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Court Says ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Conceal-Carry Permits Violates the Second Amendment
Reason ^ | Feb. 13, 2014 | Damon Root

Posted on 02/13/2014 12:43:07 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: neverdem
Nice to see one of our local docs was one of the successful plaintiffs.
21 posted on 02/13/2014 1:27:51 PM PST by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey

Yes, but it is the liberal opinions that are over-turned, not the conservative.

And this Supreme Court has been surprisingly OK on 2nd Amendment.


22 posted on 02/13/2014 1:31:31 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

3 judge panel. An en banc panel might be next.


23 posted on 02/13/2014 1:32:04 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

There are still draconian “may issue” states out there?


24 posted on 02/13/2014 1:33:11 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I wonder how many years this case has been moving through the judicial system?


25 posted on 02/13/2014 1:36:38 PM PST by TheDon (Californians are losing their right to keep and bear firearms one firearm at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’m about half way through the ruling. This opens up a very interesting avenue to achieve a sort of backdoor Constitutional carry; if the state must allow either concealed carry OR open carry and it elects a preference for concealed carry, as CA has, then it could be argued that gun permits must be issued free of charge to the indigent.


26 posted on 02/13/2014 1:37:50 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Having some small say in who gets to hold the whip doesn't make you any less a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

“There are still draconian “may issue” states out there?”

Yes. Several. NY, HI, CA, NY, MD, NJ, MA to name some of the guilty states. I’d add TX because of the very high cost of their permit.


27 posted on 02/13/2014 1:39:45 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Having some small say in who gets to hold the whip doesn't make you any less a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
The 9th Circuit panel here held that bans on open carry and near-blanket refusals of concealed carry applications are unconstitutional, i.e., the government has to choose which of the two it really wants. That is a reasonable holding. IMO the near-blanket refusals of concealed carry permits will ultimately be determined by the US Supreme Court, but the 9th Circuit holding here will likely be upheld by an en banc review. Certainly the Supreme Court will uphold it.

But California state & local governments will fight everything to the end. We just now know how it will end on open carry. That's not something local governments can restrict - only the state government can.

28 posted on 02/13/2014 1:44:04 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

As was mentioned above this is a divided opinion by 3 judge panel. Judges ina favor of right to bear arms were: O’Scannlain - Reagan apppointee and Callahan - G.W.B appointee, dissenting judge was Thomas - Clinton appointee. That pretty much explains the ruling.


29 posted on 02/13/2014 1:44:37 PM PST by JackTom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
C&C permits are only granted for the county you live in.

You sure about that? I have a friend with a concealed carry permit (He lives north of Guernville) and he told me it's good for the entire state of California. I did a search on the Internet and found nothing on point.

30 posted on 02/13/2014 1:46:05 PM PST by choirboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: choirboy

CA ccw permits are valid anywhere in the state, subject to some restrictions, court houses, state gov offices and so forth. CCW holders can even carry in a school. Check the California Rifle and Pistol Association web site.


31 posted on 02/13/2014 2:03:05 PM PST by onceone (0311, K Co., 3/5 1st Mar Div, RVN '68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The way I understand this ruling, one still has to get a CCW permit but does not need to have a valid reason to possess a permit.

Oh cynical me; a few weeks ago a CCW holder from Florida drove his car up the east cost going through a state where a highway patrolman pulled him over for no apparent reason. The officer obviously checked the Florida CCW registry and saw the man held a permit to carry. This cop asked the man if he had any firearms in his car, which the man answered no. The cop then told him to exit the car and as another patrol unit arrived on scene, the cops starting searching the mans car looking for firearms. The man fortunately left his pistol at home, otherwise he would have been arrested by these cops and would have had his firearm confiscated.

I don't believe for a minute that I am alone when I say I am very distrusting of cops, judges and politicians so I proceed accordingly.

32 posted on 02/13/2014 2:19:10 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

9th Circus rules in favor of the individual right to bear arms? Pigs are flying, people. Look up.


33 posted on 02/13/2014 2:26:16 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

>> 9th circuit actually got one right?

Not sure this is the first time.


34 posted on 02/13/2014 2:26:25 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Even the Ninth Circuit knows that the Second Amendment deserves as much respect as the rest of the Bill of Rights. Definitely a pleasant surprise.


35 posted on 02/13/2014 2:27:07 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
1. C&C permits are only granted for the county you live in. I seldom fish, hike or kayak in remote parts of my county. So if I ever got a permit, it would only be valid in my county not in the many other areas I would like fly fish, hike or kayak in.

According to usacarry.com, the permit allows you carry throughout the state. The picture of the CA license seems to bear this out:


36 posted on 02/13/2014 2:30:06 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

And just as the queers are saying that other states have to recognize sodomite marriage, it seems to me that there has to be reciprocity when it comes to carry “licenses”.


37 posted on 02/13/2014 2:33:19 PM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
C&C permits are only granted for the county you live in

Good grief; that is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

38 posted on 02/13/2014 2:50:48 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Good Cause” req. always forgets that a person rarely knows, specifically, when they will need a gun and hence, have “good cause.”


39 posted on 02/13/2014 3:13:21 PM PST by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I understood CCW issued in any county to be valid in all counties.

The only problem is defining counties who have settled on policy:

Shall issue

May issue

Siskyou is a shall issue and they have to look for a reason not to give you CCW, which is valid in all counties.

Santa Clara County is a “May Issue” and Laurie is a political gal. She just won’t issue them.


40 posted on 02/13/2014 3:25:53 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson