13 posted on
02/12/2014 11:02:41 AM PST by
tomkat
To: tomkat
17 posted on
02/12/2014 11:03:42 AM PST by
RandallFlagg
("I said I never had much use for one. Never said I didn't know how to use it." --Quigley)
To: tomkat
They didn’t use those buses because they were underwater...
according to the ‘rat Senator who was asked why they didn’t use them to evacuate the city.
47 posted on
02/12/2014 11:24:46 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: tomkat
You read my mind. Think of all the homeless people that could have been saved with those busses.
60 posted on
02/12/2014 11:38:30 AM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: tomkat
That’s what I think of - the New Orleans/ hurricane debacle that HE arranged (not the storm, of course, but the shameful response). Should have been tarred and feathered.
63 posted on
02/12/2014 11:42:12 AM PST by
bboop
(does not suffer fools gladly)
To: tomkat
65 posted on
02/12/2014 11:42:47 AM PST by
MeshugeMikey
("When you meet the unbelievers, strike at their necks..." -- Qur'an 47:4)
To: tomkat
Re: Evac buses under water? Exactly.
137 posted on
02/12/2014 8:03:02 PM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: tomkat
Which bus will Mr. Nagin be thrown under? He’ll need a snorkel.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson