Posted on 02/07/2014 10:12:52 PM PST by The Right wing Infidel
For more than 10 years, the term “Srebrenica” has been used to denote the slaughter of “innocent Muslims” at the hands of Christians – more specifically, the Bosnian Serb army, alleged to have slaughtered, according to the version currently accepted by most major media, “between 7,000 and 8,000 Muslims” when it captured that small town in eastern Bosnia in mid-July 1995. As the story goes, the Bosnian Serbs captured this “U.N.-protected zone” and proceeded to take away and execute thousands of men, women and children in the space of several days, subsequently burying them in mass graves that are still being dug up almost 12 years later. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2007/05/41373/#DllB7DmVlsRFmOoY.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I agree. We bombed the wrong side.
We bombed our fellow Christians who were defending there land and took there land and gave to the muslims
Did you know McCain has connections to the k.l.a(kosovo liberation army) the Muslim terrorist group that started this in serbia and spawned al quida,
http://www.wnd.com/2008/03/57678/ (link here about mccain ties to them)
It would not surprise me if bill clinton received a big fat check from the k.l.o for helping them to steal christian land
Its no surprising McCain was one of the biggest supporter in the congress to attack Serbia , funny that he got a big fat check from later
The only reason we got involved in the civil war in that area of the world was the identity of our Secretary of State, Madeline Albright, and her birth in that area of the world in Czechoslovakia. . . there is no other compelling national interest for the United States to have become militarily involved.
From the Saudis.
The guy has several hundred million in the bank that we know of. And no one bribes an ex-president.
Rhetorical.
I think you are right.
It amazes me that we still have troops there, but not in Iraq. At least in Iraq we were killing lots of people who hated us. No strategic interest in Kosovo, but we’re still there, lots of strategic interest in Iraq, but no troops, but then again the Kosovo war was started by a democrat so its a “good” war. Go figure.
GWB also bombed the wrong side in Iraq.
The Christians had it much better under Saddam Hussein than under today’s “Democratically elected” regime.
And the same goes for Syria — Assad never bothered the Christians in that country.
Every Muslim country requires a dictator for it to function. Just wait when sharia is the law of the land in the US.
The Serbia government had no choice but to fight back ...
The Serbian parliament and the last two presidents of Serbia have apologized for the Srebrenica massacre.
Yes it was a hoax. God Bless Serbia.
It’s a huge huge base in Kosovo. Camp Bondsteel I think it is called...
>>>GWB also bombed the wrong side in Iraq.
The Christians had it much better under Saddam Hussein than under today’s “Democratically elected” regime.
And the same goes for Syria — Assad never bothered the Christians in that country.
Every Muslim country requires a dictator for it to function. Just wait when sharia is the law of the land in the US<<<
Sunni muslims tends to inbreeding, they hate education and distrust science as a sort of witchcraft. You can imagine a societies they make.
In order to have a functional nation-state such a society need a strong leader and non-Sunni elites. Socialism, a disaster for any advanced society, is also a kind of blessing for such a nations.
“The Serbian parliament and the last two presidents of Serbia have apologized for the Srebrenica massacre.”
But not for the made up “genocide”. Surely there have been some indiscriminate killings as there must have been during the operations of that size and during the war such was Bosnian, but never on the scale the muslim apologists and their backers like McCain or Albright would like the world to think.
Muslims, on the other hand never apologized for anything.
It's not that helpful to argue about a word. Whatever you call it, the overwhelming, detailed evidence is that thousands of civilian men and boys were systematically removed and executed in large groups. And that this was done because these people belonged to a certain ethnic group.
So many of the details of this are known, but some people would prefer to believe fictional narratives that deny it ever happened.
but never on the scale the muslim apologists and their backers ... would like the world to think.
I have tried to evaluate the evidence with an open mind. My conclusion is that the scale of the massacre cannot have been exaggerated by more that a small amount.
Muslims, on the other hand never apologized for anything.
If there had been a case on the same scale perpetrated by by Muslims against Serbs during the Bosnian war, you would be telling me about it.
In any case, people should be responsible for their own behavior.
“It is often pointed out that Srebrenica was an UN “protected zone,” but it is seldom noted that the enclave was simultaneously an armed camp used for attacks against Serb villages in the surrounding areas. Muslim General Sefer Halilovic confirmed in his testimony at the Hague Tribunal that there were at least 5,500 Bosnian Army soldiers in Srebrenica after it had obtained the “safe haven” status, and that he had personally arranged numerous deliveries of sophisticated weapons by helicopter.”
The Muslim General Sefer Halilovic confirmed that there were at least 5,500 Bosnian Muslim Army soldiers in Srebrenica. More importantly these fighters had slaughtered more than 3,500 Christians prior to the fall of Srebrenica and this applies to young children, women and the elderly in surrounding villages.
Even worse, the so-called 'safe haven' meant that Bosnian Muslim forces would attack outside of the main area of central Srebenica and kill Orthodox Christians. However, they would then return to Srebrenica in order to be protected and to re-enforce their stronghold and this applies to re-arming and so forth.
The UNPROFOR commander, French General Philippe Morillon, testified that the crimes committed by Bosnian Muslim forces were “extraordinary”
On February 12 in 2004 at The Hague Tribunal Philippe Morillon testified that Bosnian Muslim forces under the Bosnian Muslim commander Naser Oric “engaged in attacks during Orthodox Christian holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region.”
Here Philippe Morillon is referring to the massacres of thousands of Orthodox Christians in the surrounding region. These are events when Christians were burnt alive, beheaded and so forth.
Srebrenica was a 'safe zone' - guaranteed by the UN! - that allowed Muslims to massacre Christian villages in the surrounding area.
The destruction of those heavily armed Muslim forces was an act of self-defense. The fact that the Muslims emplaced themselves in a populated area - effectively using the inhabitants as human shields - makes them responsible for any civilian deaths in the crossfire.
As if all this were not enough: there are also indications that Naser Oric made a deal with Clinton to let the Muslim forces in Srebrenica be destroyed (by withholding artillery support). This was to create exactly the sort of false-flag that Clinton needed to be able to publicly support the Muslim cause.
The fact that Clinton extorted official apologies from politicians of nations he had bombed into the ground means nothing.
This is the reality of Srebrenica. It was a firefight against a murderous group of Jihadis. Their destruction was turned by a subservient media into a reason for war.
Hope this was helpful.
Balkans Front ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.