Posted on 02/04/2014 5:53:31 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Two possible presidential candidates. Although there's no evidence of it on the record, some have accused the first of closing bridge-access lanes for political purposes. The other failed to respond to pleas for help, four Americans died in Benghazi, and her response was a petulant "what difference does it make?"
So where do those two candidates stand as we look to 2016? In the case of Chris Christie, his candidacy is "over" and he "doesn't belong in the conversation." Hillary Clinton? Her biggest problem is fighting an air of "inevitability." Such was the collective wisdom of today's Morning Joe panel. But to what degree have the fates and status of the two candidates been shaped by the MSM? Where would Hillary be, for example, if she were a former Republican Secretary of State with the Benghazi catastrophe on her record?
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Where would Hillary and Christie be if she were a Republican and he were a Democrat? Ping to Today show list.
--Hillary Clinton Traveled 956,733 Miles--
If that's the criteria, maybe the next president should be a pilot or flight attendant.
The inevitable never happens any more.
Look for Cuomo vs Walker in 2016.
Both over.
Mika looks constipated.
Most likely.
If that's the criteria...
...send her to the moon!
Ralph racked up a lot of miles driving that bus. He might have made a great president ;-)
“Look for Cuomo vs Walker in 2016.”
I am going with Castro vs Rubio. This is the Hispanic election.
My thought would be Susan Martinez and Sarah Palin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.