Pentagon, McDonald's Capitulate To Sharia Law

Investors.com ^ | January 29, 2014 | IBD Editorial

[jazusamo]

Islamofascism: Caving to pressure from Muslim groups, the Pentagon has relaxed uniform rules to allow Islamic beards, turbans and hijabs. It's a major win for political correctness and a big loss for military unit cohesion.

Also, the sharia-compliant regulation threatens to expand the jihadi Fifth Column that counterintelligence already is dealing with in the wake of the Fort Hood massacre. The FBI is tracking more than 100 suspected jihadists within the military.

Making special accommodations for Islam will only attract more Muslims into the military at a time when two recent terror cases highlight the ongoing danger of Muslims in uniform.

Earlier this month, a former Army soldier was sentenced to seven years in prison in a terror investigation. Craig Benedict Baxam, a Muslim convert, was said to have trained with al-Qaida's branch in Somalia. In statements to federal agents, he justified violent jihad and vowed to fight the U.S. to defend Islamic lands.

Also this month, Homeland Security arrested an Iranian-American working for the Defense Department as a contract engineer. Mozaffar Khazaee was busted sending secret documents to Tehran.

[Nowhere Man]

The reason for the ban on beards is poison gas. Facial hair will not allow a good seal for a gas mask. There is a reason for EVERYTHING in the military, or was until the libs started screwing around with it.

World War I was a boon to the then new "safety razors" at that time because of what you said where you need a shaven face to make a good seal for gas masks.

[VerySadAmerican]

Remember that it was only 7 years after 911 that a muslim named Hussein was elected president. The people that voted for him can eat at McDonald’s the rest of their lives. I won’t be eating with them.

[Minutemen]

To hell with the test, let’em breathe anthrax.

[VerySadAmerican]

Had a real estate expert look at my house yesterday. We have two crosses on the wall. She told us we would need to take them down. I’m not even sure I’m going to try to sell. But if I do, the crosses will stay. If someone is offended by my religious belief, then, for their sake, I don’t want them to buy my house. There might be some “remnants” of “cross power” hangin’ around.

[jazusamo]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

[MichaelCorleone]

That's quite brazen of her, imo. Maybe you should have countered with: “No I don't need to take them down, but it's clear I need a new agent to represent me. Good-bye.”.

[VerySadAmerican]

She’s a “stager” sent by the agent. She said “I understand. I have them hanging in my house. But it might cost you a buyer.” Sad times indeed.

[cableguymn]

Or allowing it to take up residence in our white house..

[Jacquerie]

And posters to FR tell us everyday that all we need to do is keep voting.

[I_Publius]

We just sold and kept all types of irrereverant material out, such as an old fashioned hymnal, Christian books on the nightstand, one or two decorative crosses, and, hold tight.....at least two Bibles!!!!!!

Oh...we sold in the middle of Winter, too. :)