Posted on 01/22/2014 11:32:50 AM PST by Kaslin
We've covered a number of horrible cases involving individuals and families being victimized by Obamacare, but this Michigan family's plight is uniquely heartbreaking:
A Bangor Township family of four, all of whom have disabilities, say they fall within a niche that makes the Affordable Care Act more of a burden than a blessing. Now, they say, they'll be paying nearly $8,000 more per year for medical care after being denied coverage through Obamacare. The family in question is the Daverts — husband and wife Ken and Melissa and their 15-year-old twins Austin and Michaela. The twins and their mother are afflicted with osteogensis imperfecta, a disease that makes their bones extremely fragile. They are also highly susceptible to lung infections. Ken Davert has cerebral palsy. Ken and Melissa “Missy” Davert receive their income from Social Security disability payments and have health insurance through Medicare, but that plan does not cover their children. Until recently, the children were covered by a private Blue Cross plan...“We received a letter from Blue Cross maybe four months ago stating that their plan was going to be canceled due to new requirements of Obamacare,” said Missy Davert, adding that the letter did not state what about the Affordable Care Act requirements necessitated her children be dropped from their plan. “I can imagine they didn’t fit criteria of the new plan. There were some particular benefits the new act didn’t cover.”
Obamacare tossed the Daverts' kids off of their existing Blue Cross plan, forcing the couple to contend with Democrats' lie of the year:
The Daverts then applied for coverage for their twins through the federal government’s plan. The first time they did so, their application was lost after they sent it and the second time, they were denied. They then filed a written appeal in mid January, which could take up to 90 days for a response. “What we did in the meantime, because their insurance was ending Dec. 31, we had to go out and buy a separate plan directly through Blue Cross/Blue Shield,” Missy Davert said. “The president had come on TV and said, ‘If you like your plan, you can keep your plan, we won’t require you to get marketplace insurance for another year.’ But Blue Cross/Blue Shield would not continue their plan, despite what the president said.”
Insult to injury:
The Daverts ended up purchasing a Blue Cross Gold Plan for their children...However, the out-of-pocket expenses under the new plan are more than four times what the Daverts had to previously pay. “The premiums aren’t an issue for us,” Missy Davert said. “The premiums under both plans are essentially the same. What could be costly for us are the out-of-pocket expenses. In our old plan, the most we would pay was $2,500 combined out-of-pocket per year. With the very best plan we could get them under Blue Cross, we have a $5,100 out-of-pocket maximum for each child for a total of $10,200...That’s the big issue,” Ken Davert said. “That’s an incredible amount to absorb,” Missy Davert continued.
The story goes on to note that the offices of Michigan's two Democratic Senators declined to comment about this couple's ordeal, while their Democratic Congressman helpfully phoned up their insurance company to ask why their plan was canceled. Here's a hint. I'll leave you with two conservative healthcare wonks wondering whether or not the law's wildly unpopular individual mandate tax can survive politically, particularly in light of the fact that the administration has already issued a waiver for potentially millions of adversely-impacted Americans. Also, Virginia's newly announced US Senate candidate, Ed Gillespie, is out with his first issue-based web ad of the year. Expect a heavy dose of narrative-building ads on this subject matter over the coming months:
Shame.
You get what you vote for, and so do the rest of us...
For my wife and me, the bronze plan is as much as my car payment on my FR-S and both our mortgages on our two properties, one of which includes our home, built five years ago.
So we don’t have health insurance. Duh.
If they think that’s bad, just wait for the IRS audit for “squealing” about it.
“after being denied coverage through Obamacare”
How can anyone be denied? All pre-existing were welcome
OK I had to look for the info...
They used to pay up to $2,500 out-of-pocket each year for the children...
Now it will be $10,200..
the parents are also disabled..getting social security only for income..
They probably also get food stamps..and some other benefits like free lunches for the kids at school..
I wonder how much their SS is..
doesn’t say..
If they didn’t vote for him, then I am so sorry this has fallen on you.
If they did, then they can go $%@$^$ themselves.
Deliver the mortgage on your home and all the information on your credit cards and financial assets to your doctor’s records, and go off-system on Obamacare.
It cannot possibly cost any more than the huge Ponzi scheme that the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010” is costing these people.
I guess they’re just going to have to prioritize on how they spend their money. I think that was what Kathleen Sebelius said, inferring that everyone could afford the insurance, if they would just budget more carefully.
For these people and others like them, whose main or only income is SSDI, we will soon be told that we will need to double or triple their SSDI benefits, so they can afford to live on them and pay for the kids’ health insurance deductibles.
I really think that woman has ice running through are veins. She almost makes Hillary look warm and fuzzy.
Not enough.
If the parents’ only income is SSI and they are over 65 and on Medicare, those kids would almost certainly qualify for Medicaid and possibly SSI due to their medical condition.
Not being hard-hearted here, but there are already government programs that cover this family’s need, assuming the facts in the story are correct.
If the parents’ only income is SSI and they are over 65 and on Medicare, those kids would almost certainly qualify for Medicaid and possibly SSI due to their medical condition.
Not being hard-hearted here, but there are already government programs that cover this family’s need, assuming the facts in the story are correct.
Yeah yeah yeah. I know it sounds bad but remember. Sandra Fluck gets free birth control. That is what is important.
I seriously think she might have sold her soul.
She was protecting the most evil, vile abortion practices while she was in Kansas, there’s hardly any other explanation.
Geez. I posted a similar story on the same family and the responses I got from freepers were of little to no sympathy for the family.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3114166/posts
Mustve been a full moon out when I posted that thread.
“the individual must be sacrificed for the collectivity.”
It isn’t affordable and Obama doesn’t care
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.