Skip to comments.
NBC Silent on $7.3 Million from Soros for Special Anchor’s Liberal Report
Business and Media Institute ^
| January 16, 2014
| Mike Ciandella
Posted on 01/16/2014 3:52:17 PM PST by opentalk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
01/16/2014 3:52:17 PM PST
by
opentalk
To: opentalk
If they don’t report it, it didn’t happen. Just ask obama.
2
posted on
01/16/2014 3:55:26 PM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: opentalk
Who knew? Does anybody watch NBC?
3
posted on
01/16/2014 4:03:23 PM PST
by
SgtBob
(Freedom is not for the faint of heart. Semper Fi!)
To: opentalk
Guys like Soros are why I’d be afraid to write a new constitution. Too many delegates when offered $10,000,000 would do whatever he asked. If they didn’t that same $10,000,000 could be used to make them into an Arkencide.
To: freeangel
Wow. Reporting on the reporters. Our 1st amendment works.
No the 1st amendment isn’t just for news agencies.
5
posted on
01/16/2014 4:04:50 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: SgtBob
Who knew? Does anybody watch NBC?
Ergo..."What difference does it make now?"
6
posted on
01/16/2014 4:09:22 PM PST
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: opentalk
7
posted on
01/16/2014 4:09:28 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
To: Gen.Blather
Related 2011 thread
George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution - rewriting nation's founding document
At least three White House advisers and officials,including President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, have ties to an effort funded by billionaire George Soros to push for a new, "progressive" U.S. Constitution
Now it has emerged that Sunstein has maintained extensive ties to Soros' funding,particularly with regard to a movement that openly seeks to create a "progressive" consensus as to what the U.S. Constitution should provide for by the year 2020.
Also,Attorney General Eric Holder sat on the board of a Soros-funded group pushing the same "progressive" constitution.
8
posted on
01/16/2014 4:09:55 PM PST
by
opentalk
More from 2011 article
... That event was sponsored by Soros' Open Society Institute as well as by the Center for American Progress,which is led by John Podesta,who served as co-chair of Obama's presidential transition team. Podesta's Center is said to be highly influential in helping to craft White House policy.
9
posted on
01/16/2014 4:11:34 PM PST
by
opentalk
To: opentalk
The BEST thing about Soros is his age. How much longer can he cause problems for the world?
To: opentalk
11
posted on
01/16/2014 4:21:08 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(We want our pre-existing HEALTH INSURANCE back!)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: opentalk
Only Banana Republic’s and Muslim hell holes re-write their constitution with every frequent change of the govt. Ours is fine..we just need to elect public officials that believe in it. It is obvious that our current President doesn’t believe our constitution and doesn’t think it limits or defines his powers.
13
posted on
01/16/2014 4:24:31 PM PST
by
Oldexpat
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
14
posted on
01/16/2014 4:26:31 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(;http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
To: SunkenCiv
Soros orgs recieve millions in federal handouts
15
posted on
01/16/2014 4:28:00 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: opentalk
In The Shriver Report: A Womans Nation Pushes Back From the Brink, which was published on Jan. 11, an outspokenly liberal nun, Sister Joan Chittister, took aim at religious attitudes in America that devalue and marginalize women. "Shriver was invited to the White House on Jan. 14 to present her report to President Barack Obama, whom she promoted as being sympathetic to working mothers. On NBC Nightly News that same night, Shriver contrasted a supportive Obama against a Congress that is supposedly dragging its feet on the matter. "While President Obama has pledged to fix the problem, Congress has been slow to respond," Shriver said."
What are the "religious attitudes" that hold back women? The Catholic and Orthodox restrictions of female priesthood? That effects practically no one. And what can Congress and Obama do about it? Nothing, so that can't be what they are talking about.
So what else might they be talking about? Muslim attitudes towards women? Can't be that, either - they wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole. So, again, what are these attitudes and how is Obama going to "fix the problem"?
The thing I've recently seen that most devalued women were the Colorado ads supporting Obamacare, depicting women as mindless idiots preoccupied only with casual sex and free birth control - now THAT was demeaning to women.
To: opentalk
Most American news people = Paid Democrat liars
18
posted on
01/16/2014 4:46:52 PM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: opentalk
Wait a minute. Isn’t this the same Obama administration that had the fewest women working in the White House than any in recent memory? I remember the press did a story about it a few years ago but then the subject quickly vanished from the press radar screens.
19
posted on
01/16/2014 4:58:00 PM PST
by
MNnice
To: opentalk
Center for American Progress, Communist Party USA, what’s the difference?
20
posted on
01/16/2014 5:34:36 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson